Google This is a digital copy of a book that was preserved for generations on library shelves before it was carefully scanned by Google as part of a project to make the world's books discoverable online. It has survived long enough for the copyright to expire and the book to enter the public domain. A public domain book is one that was never subject to copyright or whose legal copyright term has expired. Whether a book is in the public domain may vary country to country. Public domain books are our gateways to the past, representing a wealth of history, culture and knowledge that's often difficult to discover. Marks, notations and other maiginalia present in the original volume will appear in this file - a reminder of this book's long journey from the publisher to a library and finally to you. Usage guidelines Google is proud to partner with libraries to digitize public domain materials and make them widely accessible. Public domain books belong to the public and we are merely their custodians. Nevertheless, this work is expensive, so in order to keep providing tliis resource, we liave taken steps to prevent abuse by commercial parties, including placing technical restrictions on automated querying. We also ask that you: + Make non-commercial use of the files We designed Google Book Search for use by individuals, and we request that you use these files for personal, non-commercial purposes. + Refrain fivm automated querying Do not send automated queries of any sort to Google's system: If you are conducting research on machine translation, optical character recognition or other areas where access to a large amount of text is helpful, please contact us. We encourage the use of public domain materials for these purposes and may be able to help. + Maintain attributionTht GoogXt "watermark" you see on each file is essential for in forming people about this project and helping them find additional materials through Google Book Search. Please do not remove it. + Keep it legal Whatever your use, remember that you are responsible for ensuring that what you are doing is legal. Do not assume that just because we believe a book is in the public domain for users in the United States, that the work is also in the public domain for users in other countries. Whether a book is still in copyright varies from country to country, and we can't offer guidance on whether any specific use of any specific book is allowed. Please do not assume that a book's appearance in Google Book Search means it can be used in any manner anywhere in the world. Copyright infringement liabili^ can be quite severe. About Google Book Search Google's mission is to organize the world's information and to make it universally accessible and useful. Google Book Search helps readers discover the world's books while helping authors and publishers reach new audiences. You can search through the full text of this book on the web at |http: //books .google .com/I o 1 't'. I X, i\ CELTIC MYTHOLOGY AND EELIGION^ BY ALEXANDER ^A C B A I N, M.A., F^A. Scot. PRINTED FOR THE AUTHOR. it Snbtrnosfi : A. & W. MACKENZIE. 1885. ^-^n^i^ FRE F A.CE. The following work, all save from page 105 to the end, appeared in the Celtic Magazine in 1883-4, and is here reprinted from the Magazine type. Hence it is that it is reproduced "with all its imperfections on its head/' and the critic must be asked, before cdipdemning details at least, to note the list of corrections appended to this preface. The intention of this scries of papers was to popularise the subject of Mythology, and to apply its principles to the elucida* tion of Celtic beliefs, tales, and traditions. I wished to place clearly before my Gaelic brethren the exact position which the religious beliefs of the Celts held in the European kinship, to clear up the misty subject of " Druidism," and to reconstruct, from the shattered materials to hand, the Pantheon of their Gaelic ancestors. This I undertook, knowing that in the last part of my object — the rehabilitation of the Gaelic Olympus— ^my results must only be tentative, for the material for reconstruction is dif- ficult to deal with, and much of it is in MSS. unedited Since these papers began to appear in print, events have travelled with more than usual rapidity both in the field of general and of Celtic Mythology. It was last year that Mr Andiew Lang delivered his lively attack against the "orthodox* school of mythologists, and it was also last year that M. D'Arbois de Jubainville's important works on Celtic Literature and Myth- ology appeared. Mr Lang's attack has certainly driven the older school from several of their positions, but he has by no means overthrown either the importance of language in the development of myth, or the fact that the sun, the sky, the powers of wind and storm, and the change of day and night were the most prominent factors in the creation of the deities and powers of the ancient mythologies. Despite Mr Lang, myth- ology is, nevertheless, a dramatic view of the course of nature, iv. and a personification of its forces; and language has been a most potent force in the development of myths, because it stereotyped older epithets and expressions, which in later ages were misunder- stood. Mr Lang has, however, shown that language is by no means so much the cause of myth as Max Muller and Cox be- lieve, and that many of the myths claimed as Aryan are found also among barbarous and savage tribes all over the world. What Mr Lang has proved in regard to the origin and growth of myth- ology does not in the least invalidate the arguments and con- clusions in the following papers, for the reason that, on the whole, I followed Mr Tylor's views on Mythology, and he, like Mr Lang, is an anthropologist But what Mr Lang has invalidated in these papers of mine is the relation in which, following Max Muller, I held myth and folk-tale. Mr Lang has made it clear in his ''Custom and Myth," and better still in his introduction to Mrs Hunt's translation of " Grimm's Fairy Tales," that the old idea that the fairy or popular tale is a broken-down myth is so totally wrong, that the opposite is nearer the truth. Indeed, Mr Lang holds that the myth — the god-tale — is but a sublimated folk-tale. That, however, is not often the case. Folk-tales have been raised to myths ; the Jason myth is a case in point ; but myths have often, and, indeed, with change and advance of religion, they have generally become folk-tales. Another thing that Mr Lang has done is to place the folk-tale on a proper way towards explanation. The " orthodox " belief is that the hero of the folk- tale must be the sun-god, and that many incidents, in- cluding the beast-form he assumes, arose from " disease of lan- guage," that is, from after ages misunderstanding the epithets applied to the sun-god and to the incidents, by a previous age. This view is untenable. Mr Lang shows that savages now believe in men being transformed into animals ; in fact, that we are kin with animals as we are with one another. Transforma- tion of men into beasts is a fixed article of savage faith. It may be caused by witchcraft spell, or through the Pythagorean metempsychosis. Then he finds several incidents explained by savage customs, more especially the prohibitions or taboos we meet with in these tales. He instances the tale of ** Cupid and Psyche," the parallel of the " Hoodie" tale at the beginning of these papers ; in that tale the etiquette is that the wife must not V. sec the husband unclothed ; if she does, he must leave her. Similar customs still exist among savages, and are not un* known in modern Europe. In the tale of the " Hoodie,** there are evidently two prohibitions : first, the inmates of the house must not sleep during the first night of a child's existence ; and secondly, the wife must not make mention of a " comb" to her husband. The comb's mythic connections are attested by its frequent appearance on sculptured monuments; and the vigil- ance during the first hours of a child's existence was of course necessary because of the evil powers that hovered around. The fairies were, in the Highlands, a constant source of dread to baby life; and the special custom of watching during the first night of the child's life, while old shoes (" logaiscan") were kept burning to ward off the fairies, prevailed in the Highlands within the memory of people still living. The story was, therefore, as Mr Lang would say, invented to account for and inculcate the obser- vance of these prohibitions. M. D'Arbois de Jubainvillc's work on the " Irish Mytholo- gical Cycle and the Celtic Mythology " appeared too late to be of any assistance to me in the reconstruction of the Gaelic Olympus. I am glad to note that, in so tentative a matter, we agree so far. He points out the doublets in the Mythological cycle: Caesair — Partolan, Tuan Mac Carill — Finntan, &c. Partolan he compares to the " Silver Age " of Hcsiod ; the Nemedians are the ** Iron Age" ; and the Tuatha-De-Danann represent the "Golden Age." But he takes stop-gaps like C^sair, Partolan, and Nemed too seriously ; nor is the order of the ages comprehensible. The Fomorians who, he observes, co-exist with all the invaders, he regards as the Titans, living far away in the Isles, and he further regards them as the powers of death, darkness, and evil. The Fer-bolgs are the inhabitants of Ireland previous to the Celts or Milesians, who conquered and absorbed them. The Tuatha-De- Danann are the gods of the Gael The Dagda ( = dago-devos, •' bonus deus ") represents Zeus or Jove ; Luga corresponds to Mercury ; Ogma corresponds to Lucian's Hercules Ogmius ; Diancecht is god of Medicine ; Gobniu answers to Hephaistos (Vulcan) ; Angus, son of the Dagda, he does not characterise. The god Manannan he notes as living far away, king of the land of promise, who supplies the gods with food, raiment, and plea- vi. sure, but he docs not say how he stands in the Pantheon. Cuchu- lain he finds to be the counterpart of Heracles in descent and character. A remarkable feature of the Pantheon is the number of triads — three gods joined together — which appear. These are the three last kings of the Tuatha, the three sons of Danann« the three Fomorian chiefs, and so on ; while Gaul presents Lucan's triad of gods, and Wales abounds in all sorts of triads. The authors to whom I am most indebted are Mr Elton (** Origins of English History ") and Professor Rhys (" Celtic Britain" and in Acadevty,) I mention also Mr Fitzgerald's article on the "Ancient Irish" in Fraser^s Magazine for 1875, and his articles in the Revue Celtique. The materials — tales and myths — are chiefly from Guest's " Mabinogion," Skene's " Ancient Books of Wales," Joyce's " Celtic Romances," Ken- nedy's various books, O'Curry's Lectures, the Revue Celtique^ Campbell's " Popular Tales," and editions like Wi.ndisch's " Irische Textc." Inverness, October 1885. E RRATA. Page 1 6, lin II 28, It rt 29. II II S8. II II 89, It ti II It It II tt II 90, It II 94* tt 11 104, tl Page i7» lin II 18. tl It II It It as. tf It 26, tl ti 30. tl ti 32. tl ft 33> 11 It 56. tl It 70, It tt 90. tt MISPRINTS. 16, line 34 — For " mythoporic," read •• mythopoeic" 23 — For " push," read ** pushed." 7 — Read "Celtic-speaking." 27— Delete "S." 3_«For"it,"read"in." 2 of poetry — Read branches', and delete comma. * 20 of poetry — For •' looped," read " lopped." 8 — For •* masters," read ** master." 13 — Insert *• his" before " history." 1 1 — For " Granna," read " Granua." 1 CORRECTIONS. 17, line 33 — Delete reference to "Dagda. I — Delete "Greek, helios." 13— Delete " Vata, the Gaelic gaoth!' 36 — Delete reference to " Aigean," and " Aegeaa" " Aigean" is oceanus borrowed. I — Delete "black." See Kuhn's Beitraege, vol. viii., p. 44. 22— After " Century," insert " b.c" 22— For " is,*" read « are." 17— For " five," read " fifteen." 22 — For " Mabinogion," read "MabinogL" So, too, at page 83/ line 21. 2 7— Delete " Frecart" 5 from bottom — Insert " Mercury and " before " Taranis." CELTIC MYTHOLOGY. The field of Mythology, strictly defined, embraces the fabulous events believed in by a nation and the religious doctrines implied in these. But the term is for convenience' sake extended so as to include the kindred subject of folk-lore. Now folk-lore in- cludes all those popular stories of which the fairy tales of our nursery are a good illustration, and where the religious element implied in Mythology is absent. The term Celtic Mythology, in these papers, is understood, therefore, to include the popular traditions and legendary tales of the Celts, the fabulous actions and exploits of their heroes and deities, the traditions of their early migrations, their fairy tales, and the popular beliefs in regard to the supernatural world. The scope of the discussion will include an introductory section or two on the general prin- ciples of Mythology — its cause and spread, and the connection of the Mythology of the Celts with those of the kindred nations of Europe and Asia. Character of Myth. "There was once a farmer, and he had three daughters. They were washing clothes at a river. A hoodie crow came round, and he said to the eldest one, *' M-pos-n-ffii — Will you marry me — farmer's daughter?' *I won't, indeed, you ugly brute; an ugly brute is a hoodie,' said she. He came to the second one on the morrow, and he said to her, ''M-pos-u-mi — Wilt thou wed me?' *Not I, indeed,' said she; *an ugly brute is a hoodie.' The third day he said to the youngest, ^' M-pos-u-mt — Wilt thou wed me — farmer's daughter?' 'I will wed thee/ said she ; *a pretty creature is the hoodie.' And on the morrow they married. " The hoodie said to her, * Whether wouldst thou rather that I should be a hoodie by day and a man at night ; or be a hoodie at night and a man by day?* * I would rather that thou wert a man by day and a hoodie at night,* says she. After this he was a splendid fellow by day and a hoodie at night A few days after he got married he took her to his own house. " At the birth of the first child, there came at night the very finest music that ever was heard about the house. Every one slept, and the child was taken away. Her father came to the door in the morning, and he was both sorrowful and wrathful that the child was taken away. "The same thing, despite their watching, happened at the birth of the second child: music — sleep— and stealing of the child. The same thing happened, too, at the birth of the third child, but on the morning of the next day they went to another house that they had, himself and his wife and his sisters-in-law. He said to them by the way, * See that you have not forgotten something.' The wife said, * I forgot my coarse comb.* The coach in which they were fell a withered faggot, and he flew away as a hoodie! "Her two sisters returned, and she followed after him. When he would be on a hill-top, she would follow to try and catch him; and when she would reach the top of a hill, he would be in the hollow on the other side. When night came, and she was tired, she had no place of rest or dwelling. She saw a little house of light far from her, and though far from her, she was not long in reaching it "WTien she reached the house she stood deserted at the door. She saw a little laddie about the house, and she yearned after him exceedingly. The house-wife told her to come in, that she knew her cheer and travel. She lay down, and no sooner did the day come than she rose. She went out, and as she was going from hill to hill, saw a hoodie, whom she followed as on the day before. She came to a second house; saw a second laddie; pursued the hoodie on a third day, and arrived at night at a third house. Here she was told she must not sleep, but be clever and catch the hoodie when he would visit her during night But she slept; he came where she was, and let fall a ring on her right hand. Now, when she woke, she tried to catch hold of him, and she caught a feather of his wing. He left the feather with her. and went away. In the morning she did not know what to do till the house-wife told her that he had gone over a hill of poison, over which she could not go without horse shoes on her hands and feet She gave her man's clothes, and told her to learn smithying till she could make horse shoes for herself. " This she did, and got over the hill of poison. But on the day of her arrival, she found that her husband was to be married to the daughter of a great gentleman that was in the town. As festivities were in progress, the cook of the house asked the stranger to take his place and make the wedding meal She watched the bridegroom, and let fall the ring and feather in the broth intended for him. With the first spoon he took up the ring, with the next the feather. He asked for the person who cooked the meal, and said, 'that now .was his married wife.' The spells went off him. They turned back over the hill of poison, she throwing the horse shoes behind her to him, as she went a bit forward, and he following her. They went to the three houses where she had been. These were the houses of his three sisters ; and they took with them their three sons, and they came home to their own home, and they were happy." ♦ Such is a good specimen of the folk-tale, and the folkrtales are merely the modern representatives of the old Mythology — merely the detritus, as it were, of the old myths which dealt with the gods and the heroes of the race. In the above tale we are in quite a different world from the practical and scientific views of the 19th century; we have birds speaking and acting as rational beings, and yet exciting no wonder to the human beings they come in contact with ; supernatural spells whereby men may be turned into animals ; a marriage with a bird, which partially breaks these spells, and the bird becomes a man for part of the day ; supernatural kidnapping, ending in the disappearance of the man-bird ; and pursuit of him by the wife through fairy regions of charms and spells and untold hardships — a pursuit which ends successfully. It looks all a wild maze of childish nonsense, unworthy of a moment's serious consideration ; it would certainly appear to be a hopeless subject for scientific research ; for what could science, whose object is truth, have to do with a • Abridged from Ompbell's West Hijjhland Talcs, vo\. x, v ^V V tissue of absurdities and falsehoods ? But this view is a super- ficial one, though it is the one commonly held. On looking more deeply into the matter, we shall find that after all there is a method in the madness of Mythology, and that the incon- gruous mass of tales and broken-dowrt myths that make up a nation's folk-lore is susceptible of scientific treatment Science first attacks the problem by the method of comparison ; it com- pares the myths and tales of one nation with those of another, with the view of discovering similarities. The outlines, for ex- ample, of the tale already given, exist not merely in one or two more tales in our own folk-lore, but can also be traced over all the continent of Europe, as well as in many parts of Asia. The outline of the tale is this — The youngest and best of three daughters is married or given up to some unsightly being or monster, who in reality is a most beautiful youth, but who is under certain spells to remain in a low form of life until some maiden is found to marry him. He then regains his natural form, though, as a rule, only partially ; and the newly- married pair have to work out his complete redemption from the spells. But, just as he is about to be free from the spells, the curiosity or disobedience of the wife ruins every- thing; he disappears, and then follows for the wife the dark period of wandering and toil, which can be brought to an end only by the achievement of tasks, generally three in number, each hopelessly beyond human powers. The husband, who meanwhile has forgotten, owing to the nature of the spells upon him, all about his wife, is on the eve of marrying another, when the last task of all is accomplished by the persevering courage of • the wife. The spells then leave him for ever, and happiness reigns in the household ever after. There are in our Highland folk-lore one or two versions of this same tale. The story of the " Daughter of the Skies," in Mr Campbell's book, is one variation. Here the hoodie crow is re- placed by a little doggie, and the wife's disobedience is clearly brought out, while the supernatural machinery — the magical scissors and needle, for example — is much more elaborate. The tale also is found in Norway; in the Norse tale, "East of the Sun and West of the Moon," the hero ap^t^ts ^\.^\^\. "^s '^x^^xjNss. bear, who, on his marriage wilh iVve Yvcxo\w^>\i^covwr5» "^ vcgsxv\s^ night She must not, however, sec him, for light must not fall on his body or else he at once disappears. But the wife, instigated by her mother, steals a sight of him by lamp-light, with the con- sequence that he awakes and vanishes. Then follow her trials, pursuit, and recovery of him. The beautiful Greek tale of Psyche and Cupid is but a variation of the same myth. Psyche, the youngest of three royal daughters, incurs the wrath of Venus, who sends Cupid to inspire her with love for something con- temptible; as Titania, in Shakespeare, is made to fall in love with the transformed weaver, Bottom. But Cupid, captivated by her beauty, falls in love with her himself, conveys her to a secret cave, and visits her only at night, under strict charge of her not attempting to see him by any light Her jealous sisters persuade her that she is married to some ugly monster, and she accord- ingly determines to disobey his injunctions, and inspect him by lamp-light In so doing, she allows in her admiration of his beauty, a drop of hot oil to fall on his shoulder, and he awakes, and escapes. She suffers woes untold in her pursuit of him, being finally a slave in the household of Venus, who treats her very cruelly. But, of course, she recovers her lost lover at long last And, again, in India, in the old religious books of the Brahmins, is a somewhat similar tale — the stoiy of Urvasi and Pururavas, the mairf features of which are the same as the Gaelic and Greek tales already given. To the English reader, the well- known tale of " Beauty and the Beast" will at once occur as an exact parallel to all these. And, if we take the myths where the heroine is the loathly monster, we shall find an equally wide distribution. We have the Hindu tale, where the Princess is disguised as a withered old woman ; the Loathly Lady of Teu- tonic Mythology; and the Celtic story of Diarmad's love for the daughter of the king of the Land under the Waves, who appears first as a hideous monster, and becomes, on approaching Diarmad, the most beautiful woman ever seen. Thus, then, we have traced the same myth among nations so widely apart as the Celts and Hindus, while, intermediate between these, we found it among the Greeks and Teutona And some myths are even more widely distributed than that; the tale of the imprisoned maiden and the hero who rescues her from the dragon or jTJunstcr apjK:ars among all the nations of Europe as well as 6 among many of the nations of Asia. Hence, from India in the East, to Ireland in the West, we may find a great mass of mythi- cal talcs common to the various nations. And this being the case, it may plainly become a matter of scientific enquiry, first, What the cause of these peculiar myths and tales can be? and, secondly. What the significance is of their wide distribution? Cause of Myth. The cause and origin of these myths have puzzled philoso- phers of all ages, and it is only a generation ago when the first unravelling of the didicult problem really took place. In olden times their origin was set down to the well-known faculty of invention that man possesses; they were mere inventions and fictions, mostly purposeless, though some were evidently in- tended for explanations of natural phenomena or of historical events, and others again for the conveyance of moral truth. There were practically two schools of myth-explainers; those who regarded myths as mere allegories or parables, and from them extracted codes of moral obligation and hidden knowledge of the mysteries of nature ; and, again, those who, so to speak, " rationalised " the myths — that is to say, those who explained myths as exaggerated real events. Some of these explained, for example, Jupiter as king of Crete in the pre-historic times; and, again, the giant that Jack killed, according to such explanations, was not necessarily far exceeding the natural limit of six or seven feet in height, for the only point to notice was that he was a big burly brute of little sense, overcome by the astuteness of a much lesser man. But this theory gets into grave difficulties when it grapples with the supernatural and the supranatural ; in fact, it fails ignominiously. And as to the allegorical theory, while it has no difficulty in explaining Jack the Giant Killer as merely the personification of the truth that power of mind is superior to power of body, that theor}' is completely wrecked in explaining the myths of Jupiter and the gods generally. No allegory can explain most of these myths, especially the older myths ; while the different explanations given by different "allegorizers" of even the simplest myths point to a fundamental error in this theory. Now, it must not be supposed that both allegory and real events had no share in the formation of myths ; they were indeed, most potent factors in the later stages of Mythology, and must have existed all along as a cause for myth. Another theory may be noticed in passing as to the origin of myths in regard to the deities and cosmogony of the world. It may be called the "degradation" theory, and the principle of it is this: As all languages were supposed by theologians to be descendants of the original Hebrew tongue spoken in Eden, so the Mytholc^y of all nations must be more or less a broken-down remembrance of the Hebrew religion and philosophy, first imparted to man in the Garden of Eden. The stoutest supporter of this view is Mr Gladstone. He goes so far as to hold that distinct traces of the Trinity can be found in Greek Mythology, and he consequently resolves Zeus, Apollo, and Athena into the three persons of the Trinity! Supposing for a moment that this theory of the degradation of myth was true, or, indeed, that our only explana- tion was either or both of the other theories, what a mass of senseless wickedness and immorality much of the deservedly admired Greek Mythology would be? Such theories would argue equal wickedness in the race from whose fancy such inven- tions sprung: for the Greek Olympus is very full of rapine, pari- cide, and vice. Yet the Greeks were neither an immoral nor degraded race, but far otherwise. It is this dark side of a nation's Mythology that has puzzled and shocked so many philosophers, and made shipwreck of their theories as to the origin of myths. With the rise of the science of language and ks marked success, all^ within this century, a complete revolution has taken place, not merely in the case of philology itself, but also in the kindred subjects of Ethnology and Mythology. The methods adopted in linguistic research have also been adopted in the case of Mythology — first, all preconceptions and national prejudices have been put aside ; then a careful, even painful examination and comparison of languages have been made, to find laws of interchange of sounds; a consequent discovery of the relationships between languages has taken place; and lastly, a discussion as to the origin of language is thus rendered possible. Exactly the same methods have been employed in the elucidation of myths, with a success that, on the whole, is gratifying. In so 8 airy and fanciful a subject, results of such strict scientific accuracy cannot be obtained as in the kindred science of language. And a good deal of harm has also been done, even with scientific methods, by pressing some theories of explanation too far. Some Mythologists, for example, are too apt to reduce every myth to a myth about the sun, and hence the evil repute of the "solar myth" theory. But this is merely a good theory injudiciously used ; it does not alter the fact of the importance in Mythology of the sun worship. The theory of the cause of myth that finds most favour at the present time is that which explains myth in connection with, and dependence on, language ; while at the same time due regard is had to the other possible sources of it in allegory, analogy, and real, though exaggerated, events. The way in which language gives rise to myth can, however, be understood only after a con- sideration of the mental powers, state of culture, and consequent interpretation of nature which existed among primitive and myth- making men. Language is but the physical side, as it were, of mythology, and the mental side of it must be considered before the action of language can be appreciated properly. The origin of myth springs from the same cause as the origin of science ; they are both man's attempt to interpret his surroundings. Myth is but the badly remembered interpretation of nature given in the youth and inexperience of the world when the feelings were predominant ; science is the same interpretation in the old age of the world, given under the influence of the ** freezing reason's colder part." Man in the myth-making stage was ignorant of the cause and real character of the mighty natural forces around him — ignorant even of the unaltering uniformity of nature — indeed the only thing the Celts said they were afraid of was that the heavens should fall ! The relations of cause and effect they interpreted by their own feelings and will-power ; every moving thing, animate or inanimate, was regarded as impelled by a force akin to that which impelled man; that is, by a will-force. Even •stationary nature — the everlasting hills and the solid earth — was endowed with feeling, will, and thought. All the mental powers that man found controlling his own actions were unconsciously transferred to nature. A personal life was accordingly attributed to sun, moon, clouds, winds, and the other natural powers ; they were looked upon as performing their special functions by means of faculties of mind and body analogous to those of man or beast The varying phenomena of the sky, mom and eve, noon and black-clouded night, were the product of the life that dwelt in each. The eclipse of the sun, for example — a most dreaded event in ancient times — ^was supposed to be caused by a wild beast attempting to swallow the lord of day ; and men poured forth, as some savages do yet, with timbrels and drums, to frighten away the monster. The clouds were cows with swelling udders, milked by the sun and wind of heaven — the cattle of the sun under the care of the wind. The thunder was the roar of a mighty beast ; the lightning, a serpent darting at its prey. Modern savages are in much this state of culture, and their beliefs have helped greatly in unravelling the problem of mythology. The ideas which children form of outward nature exemplifies in some degree the mythic age through which the race in its childhood passed ** To a little child not only are all living creatures endowed with human intelligence, but everything is alive. In his world, pussy takes rank with * Pa* and * Ma' in point of intelligence. He beats the chairs against which he has knocked his head ; the fire that burns his finger is * naughty fire' ; and the stars that shine through his bedroom window are eyes like mamma's, or pussy's, only brighter." It was on these wrong impressions — this anthropomorphic view of nature — that language was founded. Language, in man's passing to a higher state of culture, still kept, stereotyped and fixed, the old personal explanations and statements about nature ; the language did not change, but man's views of natural causes and events changed very much as he got more civilised — more free from the influence of his feelings, and more under the sway of his reasoning powers. The knowledge and ideas of earlier men were thus, as it were, fossilised in language, and when the feeling and personification impressed on language had passed into a more intellectual age, the result was misinterpretation and a too literal acceptance of many of the warm and vivid epithets employed of old. The personal explanation of the sun's motion, for instance, and the attributes and epithets given to it, all charged with life and feeling, were in the course of time and language taken in a more literal way, and, since slightly more B 10 scientific views were held as to the real nature of the sun, the old explanations were fastened to a separate sun-god, and thus a divorce was made between the sun and the personality given to it in the old epithets and explanations. The result was that there came to be a sun and a sun-god, Apollo, quite separate ; and the life-history given to this sun-god was taken from the explana- tions formerly given, in personal and anthropomorphic language, of the sun's daily and yearly course, his " rising" and " setting," for example, expressions which, though anthropomorphic, are still in use. A myth cannot, therefore, well arise unless the true meaning of a word or phrase has been forgotten, and a false meaning or explanation fastened on it We may take an ex- ample from Greek mythology to illustrate this. Prometheus, the fire-bringcr, is merely the personification of the wooden fire-drill; for the word is derived from the same source as the Sanscrit pramanthas, the " fire machine." Transplanted to Greek soil, the word lost its original signification with the loss of the thing sig- nified, and became a mythological name, for which a new etymo- logy had to be coined. Now, "promethes," in Greek, means "provident," and so Prometheus, the fire-bringer, was transformed into the wise representative of forethought, who stole the fire from heaven for suffering humanity; and a brother was supplied him in the foolish Epimetheus or "afterthought" And thereby hangs one of the most famous and noble myths of antiquity. Gaelic, in its modern shape even, presents some very start- ling personifications of natural objects. The regular expression for " The sun is setting" is " Tha a' ghrian 'dol a laidhe" — " going to bed." Mr Campbell, in his very literal and picturesque trans- lation of the West Highland tales, does not hesitate to follow the Gaelic even in its most personal metaphors. " Beul na h-oidhche," "nightfall," is given literally as "the mouth of night" Gaelic poetry, too, is as a rule much more instinct with life and feeling in dealing with natural objects than English poetry. Ossian's address to the setting sun may be quoted to show what a mine of metaphor, and consequent mythology, exists in our poetic and elevated language — " An d* fhag thu gorm astar nan speur, A mhic gun bhcud, a*s 5r-bhuidh* ciabh ? Tha dorsan na h-oidhche dhuit reidh, Agus philliun do chlos san iar. n Thig na stuaidh mu'n cuairt gu mall, A choimhcad fir a's glaine gruaidh, A' togail fo eagal an ceann Ri d* fhaicinn cho Mllidh 'n ad shoain. Gabhsa cadal ann ad ch5s, A ghriaiii a*s till o d' chlos le aoibhneas.** These lines bring us back to the anthropomorphism of the Vedic hymns of India, to which alone, in their richness of personification and mythic power, they can be compared. Allied to the linguistic theory of myth is also the simpler case of those myths consciously started to ^explain the names of nations, countries, and places. A common method of accounting for a national name was to invent an ancestor or patriarch who bore that name in an individual form. Britain, so say the myths, is so named from Brutus, grandson of iEneas, the Trojan hero, who first ruled here. Scotland gets its name from Scota, the daughter of Pharaoh. The names of places are dealt with in the same way, and, if the name is anyways significant, the myth takes the lines indicated by the popular etymology of the name. This is the origin of the name of Loch-Ncss : " Where Loch-Ness now is there was once a fine glen. A woman went one day to the well to fetch water, and the spring flowed so much that she got frightened, left her pitcher, and ran for her life. Getting to the top of a hill, she turned about and saw the glen filled with water. "Aha!' said she, 'tha loch ann a nis;* and hence the lake was called Loch-Ness." A somewhat similar account is given of the origin and name of Loch-Neagh, in Ireland, and Loch-Awe, in Argyleshire. From such myths as the last we gradually pass to myths that do not depend in the least on the quibbling and changes of language, but are, consciously or unconsciously, forged explana- tions of national customs, historical events, or natural phenomena. Thus the custom among the Picts whereby the succession was in the female line, was mythically explained by Bcde, thus: The Picts, having invaded Scotland, came to terms with the indigen- ous Gaels, and, as they brought no women with them, the compact was that, if the Gaels gave them their daughters as wives, the succession would be in the female line. Again, has the reader ever thought why the sea is salt? Well, this is the reason why. 12 A man once got possession, it is needless to detail how, of a fairy quern which was " good to grind anything," only requiring certain cabalistic words to set it going or to stop it A ship captain bought it to grind salt for him on his voyage. In mid- ocean the captain gave the quern the necessary order to grind salt, and it did ; but unfortunately he forgot the incantation for stopping it The quern ground on and filled the ship with salt till it sank to the bottom of the sea, where the quern is still grinding salt And that is the reason why the sea is salt If any one is sceptical, just let him taste the sea water and he will know its truth ! Spread of Myth. Closely akin to the consideration of the cause of myth is the question why myths and tales, evidently of the same origin, exist among nations differing widely both in language and locality. We found that tales of transformed lovers, descending even to similarities in minute details, and hence showing evidences of a common source, existed among all the chief nations of Europe, Western Asia, and India. Besides, other myths of a more general character are found all over the world. Now, what is the cause of this wide distribution of the same myths ? Two or three explanations are offered for this, each of which can correctly ex- plain why some particular myths or tales, but none of which can explain why the whole body of mythology and folk-lore, is so widely distributed. Some hold that the stories and myths have been borrowed or transmitted from one nation to another ; travel- lers and translators, they think, will account for nearly the whole of them. While it cannot be denied that many tales have permeated from one nation to another, this will by no means account for the similarities of myths among two nations or more, in whose langu- age and customs these myths are so deeply embedded and in- grooved that we should have to say the language too was bor- rowed. If a myth, and, to a less degree, a tale, depend on a nation's language — its modes of thought and expression, if the roots of the proper names be embedded in the language, and consequently obscured, that myth and that tale must belong to that nation. They belong to that s.uopcu inheritance as much as its language. Of course, care must be exercised in deciding I I what is really the peculiar property of a nation, and distinction made between the various classes into which the materials of I mythology and folk-lore fall "That certain -deities occur in India, Greece, and Germany, having the same names and the same character, is a fact that can no longer be denied. That certain heroes, too, known to Indians, Greeks, and Romans, point to one and the same origin for these nations, both by their name and by their history, is a fact by this time admitted by all whose admission is of real value. As heroes are in most cases gods in disguise, there is nothing startling in the fact that nations who had worshipped the same gods should also have preserved some common legends of demigods or heroes, nay, even in a later phase of thought, of fairies and ghosts. The case, however, be- comes much more problematical when we ask whether stories also, fables told with a decided moral purpose, formed part of that earliest Aryan inheritance?" Here Max Miiller draws a dis- tinct line between fables with a moral or educative purpose and the rest of the materials of mythology, and he has clearly demon- strated that many such are borrowed. The fables of JEsop have been adopted into every language in Europe, and the mora! talcs of the Indians, after many vicissitudes, found a "local habitation" in the pages of La Fontaine and others. Another explanation for the distribution of myths is that primitive men worked in similar grooves wherever they lived; man's circum- stances being the same, his ideas and the expression of them will present strong resemblances everywhere. This view will account for the myths that are most widely distributed over the earth's surface. Jack the Giant-Killer, for instance, appears in the Zulu story of Uhlakanyana, who cheats the cannibal g^ant and his mother, to the latter of whom he had been delivered to be boiled, and whom he cunningly succeeds in substituting for him- self But the theory can apply only in a general way; to the great body of m>^hs common to certain nations it cannot apply at all; it does not touch their deep and often detailed resem- blances. What harmonises best with the facts of mythologic distribution is the grouping of nations into families proved to be genealogically allied from possessing a common body of myths and talcs that must be descended from a parent stock. Although the facts of comparative mythology are sufficiently strong of 14 themselves to prove the common origin of the nations from India to Ireland, yet it is satisfactory that the science of language has already proved the common descent of these nations, as far at least as language is concerned. Linguists have called the parent nation, from which they have sprung, the Aryan nation, a name which shall be adopted in this discussion. The only other group of nations that can satisfactorily be shown by their language and mythology to possess a common descent is the Semitic, which includes the Hebrews, Chaldeans, and Arabians. The Aryan and Semitic races have nothing in common, except what is bor- rowed, either in the matter of language or myth. When we are told that the Celtic god Bel is the same as the Semitic Baal, we may conclude that the assertion is, more than likely, both un- scientific and untrue. The Aryan Nation. From the comparison of roots in the various present and past descendants of the original Aryan tongue, and, in a less degree, from a comparison of their myths, we arc enabled to form a fair idea of the culture and religion of the Aryans. Not only can radical elements expressing such objects and relations as father, mother, brother, daughter, husband, brother-in-law, cow, dog, horse, cattle, ox, corn, mill, earth, sky, water, star, and hun- dreds more, be found identically the same, in the various branches of the Aryan tongue, now or sometime spoken, but they can also be proved to possess the elements of a mythological phraseology clearly descended from a common source. In the matter of cul- ture, the Aryans were organised in communities framed on the model of the patriarchal household. They had adopted a system of regular marriage with an elaborate grading of kinships and marriage affinities. In the household the father was king and priest, for there was also a family religion ; the wife and the rest of the family, though subservient to the patria potestaSy were far from being slaves ; while, outside the household, grades and ranks of nobility or kinship were strictly marked. Comfortable houses and clustered villages, clearings and stations, with paths and roads, wercj in existence ; the precious metals, together with copper, tin, and bronze, were in use, but iron was probably un- known. The domestic animals had long been tamed and named. 15 • for cattle and flocks composed their chief wealth, though the plough tilled the field and corn was grown and crushed in the mills and querns. They could count to one hundred at the very least, for the root of ceud^ ** htittd-rcA^* is common to all the descendant tongues, and they had divided the year into seasons and months — a fact which is especially proved by the root for month being taken from the name given to the moon, " the measurer." They spoke a language that was highly inflected and complex ; that is to say, the relation between words and the relations of time (or tense) and mood were expressed by changes in the terminations of words. On the whole, the Aryans were high in the barbaric state of culture, as opposed, on the one hand to the savage, and, on the other, to the civilised state of progress. In regard to religion and Mythology, the Aryans were in much the same stage of advancement as in their culture generally. As their culture and language had required long ages to reach up to the state of comparative excellence at which they had arrived, so, too, their religion must have passed through lower phases until it reached the well-developed cosmos of Aryan times. And as there are not wanting many signs of those earlier stages of belief both in Aryan Mythology and in the Mythologies of the descendant nations, it is necessary to glance briefly at what these stages may have been. Belief in the supernatural exists, and has existed, in all races of men whose beliefs we have any knowledge of. The lowest phase of this belief is known as "Animism," and consists in believing that what is presented to us in our dreams and visions has a real existence. Savage man makes no distinc- tion between his dreaming and waking existence. He sees the "shadows" of the dead in his sleep, and firmly believes in their objective reality. But not merely the dead alone have shadows or spirits ; the living, too, have spirits or duplicates of self. Animals, also, and material objects, have souls, for is not the dead hero seen in dreams wearing the ghosts of arms — sword and hatchet, and such like — that he possessed in life? The worship of ancestors would appear to have been the first form in which these beliefs took the shape of an active religion or worship of higher beings. Ancestor worship, though first, is by no means lost in subsequent stages, for of all forms it is the most persistent in its survival. Modern China and ancient Rome are prominent 16 proofs of this fact. From ancestors, it is an easy stop to worship the ghosts of other persons ; sometimes these were looked on as beneficent, and at other times a§ maleficent, beings, whose help was to be invoked or whose wrath was to be deprecated. Ghosts, ancestral and other, might inhabit natural objects — trees, rivers, wells, and animals ; and this, combined with the worship of the actual ghosts of these objects, sometimes gave rise to " fetishism," so well called the worship of " stocks and stones." Totemism, again, consists in the worship of a tribal badge; some clan or nation worship a particular object, gene- rally an animal, a form of worship which may easily have sprung from ancestor worship, since the ancestral ghost may have taken that particular form. Some go so far as to assert that the names of some of the I^ighland and Irish clans and their badges are remnants or remembrances of this worship, and appeal in proof is especially made to the clan **Chattan," with its animal crest, the cat. The next stage is the worship of the nature-spirits, or the natural powers as seen in objects of outward nature — clouds, lightning, and sky. This gives rise to polytheism proper, and, perhaps, prior to that, to henotheism, as Max Muller has so well named that " totemic" worship of one especial element of nature, making it for the moment the supreme deity with all the attributes that are applicable to it embellished and exhausted. In polytheism the plurality of deities is expressed ; in henotheism it is implied. Polytheism generally presents a dynastic system of gods under the rule of one supreme king or father, while heno- theism implies a co-ordination of deities. "These deities," says Mr Sayce, "are necessarily suggested by nature; the variety of nature overpowers in an infantile state of society the unity for which the mind of man is ever yearning. Gradually, however, the attributes applied to the objects and powers of nature take the place of the latter; the sun becomes Apollo, the storm Ares. Deities are multiplied with the multiplication of the epithets which the mythoporic age changes into divinities and dcmi-gods, and side by side with a developed Mythology goes a developed pantheon. The polytheism, which the infinite variety of nature made inevit- able, continues long after the nature worship that underlay it has grown faint and forgotten. A time at last comes when even abstract names have to submit to the common process ; temples 17 arc raised to Terror and Fear, to Love and Reverence ; and the doom of the old polytheism of nature is at hand When once the spirit of divinity has been breathed into abstractions of the human mind, it cannot be long before their essential unity is recognised, and they are all summed up under the one higher abstraction of monotheisntL" But this quotation anticipates the history of Aryan Myth- ology in the descendant nations. Aryan religion itself was a fully developed hcnotheism, or rather a polytheism, where the Supreme Deity was different at different times in the eyes of the same worshipper. At one time, to take the Vedic hymns as represen- tative of the oldest and nearest stratum of religious thought to the Aryan religion, Indra is the only god whom the singer recog- nises, and he exhausts his religious vocabulary on his praise alone ; and at another time Varuna receives all worship, at another it is AgnL Indra represents the heaven-god, more especially in the view of a rain-giving deity, for the root is the same as the English water, and is seen also in the sacred River Indus. Agni is the god of fire ; Varuna, of the canopy of heaven — the Greek Uranus. Comparing and analysing the ele- ments of Teutonic, Greek, and Hindu Mythology, for example, we may arrive at a tolerably clear conception of the Aryan pan- theon and religious cultus. It would seem the chief deity was connected with the worship of light; the shining canopy of heaven was the head of the Aryan Olympus. The Gaelic word dia (and rf/;/day); Sanscrit, Dyaus; Greek, Zeus; Latin, deus and 5^;/-piter ; and English, Tiw (as seen in T/z^^day), are from the primitive name of this god, their common root being ^/V, shining. Hence dia originally meant the bright sky, and Jupiter, the " sky- father," is the Roman version of " Father in Heaven." Fire, in all its manilcstations, was an especial object of worship ; Agni is the Vedic name of this diety, which appears in Latin ignis^ and Gaelic ain (heat), but the Gaelic equivalent deity would appear to have been the ** Dagda," or the Great Good Fire. The sun and moon were prominent among the deities, the sun being the most in favour, perhaps, of all the gods. The epithets applied to him are innumerable, and, as a consequence, scarcely two nations have the same name for the sun-god, and nearly all have one or two deities that are phases of solar worship. The Sanscrit, surya; ^ C ^» 18 Latin, sol; Greek, Julias; English, sun; and Gaelic, sdus^ present the chief root, the first four actually meaning the " sun," and being used as the name of the sun-deity often. And there were other gods hardly inferior to these gods; such were what we may call the " meteorological" deities — the regulators of weather and seasons. Prominent among these was the thunder god, who brings thunder and rain ; in the Vedic hymns his place is filled by the chief god Indra ; in Latin he is the Jupiter Tonans ; in the Norse M>lhology, he appears as Thor who is next in importance to Odin himself; and in the Celtic Mythology, he is known as Taranis. The storm god was worshipped under the title of Maruts, the Latin Mars, and Greek Ares. The wind, Vata, the Gaelic gaoth^ had a high posi- tion among the deities, but among the descendant nations its position is not quite so high, unless we connect with it the god Hermes, who in Greek Mythology is clearly a wind god both in his connection with music and as messenger to the gods. The gods we have hitherto discussed belong to the intangi- ble objects of nature — ^thc sky, stars, sun, dawn, and, perhaps, so too the " weather" gods. Max Muller gives two other possible classes of deified objects: semi-tangible objects such as trees, mountains, the sea, the earth. These objects supply the material for what he calls the semi-deities. And thirdly, lowest of all, are tangible objects, such as " stocks and stones" and other elements of fetishism. The worship of semi-tangible objects shows clearly a remnant of the old animism, for these objects are endowed in savage culture with spirits of a personal type. "The lowest races," says Mr Tylor, ** not only talk of such nature-spirits, but deal with them in a thoroughly personal way, which shows how they are modelled on human souls. Modem travellers have seen North Americans paddling their canoes past a dangerous place on the river, and throwing in a bit of tobacco with a prayer to the river-spirit to let them pass. An African wood cutter who has made the first cut at a great tree has been known to take the precaution of pouring some palm-oil on the ground, that the angry tree-spirit coming out may stop to lick it up, while the man runs for his life. The state of mind to which these nature- spirits belong must have been almost as clearly remembered by the Greeks, when they could 3till fancy the nymphs of the lovely 19 groves and springs and grassy meadows coming up to the council of the Olympian gods, or the dryads growing with the leafy pines and oaks, and uttering screams of pain when the wood- man's axe strikes the trunk." These nature spirits play a most important part in folk-lore, appearing in the tales of the river demon, the water kelpie, who drowns his victim in the whirl- pool ; and in the giants, trolls, and dwarfs, who represent moun- tain and earth spirits; the healing waters of sacred wells have only adopted saints' names in place of the old pagan deity; while the little elves and fairies of the woods are but dim recollections of the old forest spirits. Of magic, a word or two may be said. It must be remem- bered that the gods could change their shape at pleasure ; their normal shape among Aryan nations was the human, but they could assume the shape of particular men or beasts, or even of inanimate objects, for Jupiter came into Danae's prison in a shower of gold. Perseus* magical hat of darkness and shoes of swiftness belong to the same cloud-changing character. Spells and enchantments form an important feature of magical powers, and have their origin in spirit-explanations of the numbing power of frost, the relaxing power of heat, the power of drugs, as of the Indian Soma, and doubtless in the magnetic influence exerted by some men and animals, notably the serpent And if we descend still lower, we And magic as a rule depend on a false use of analogies. The Zulu who has to buy cattle may be seen chew- ing a bit of wood, in order to soften the breast of the seller he is dealing with, for as the wood gets softer in his mouth, the seller's heart is supposed also to soften. Such superstitions exist even in our own country to the present day. The writer of this has known of a case where a clay body "corpan creadha," was actually made and stuck over with nails and pins, and placed in a stream channel to waste away. As the clay wasted, so with sharp pangs would waste away the person for whom it was intended. The ethical side of the Aryan religion presented some in- teresting features. The contest between the powers of light and darkness — Dyaus and Indra on one side against Ahriman or Vritra, the bright sun-god against the snake-god of darknes.s, ApoWo strangling the Python, represents a real ethical idea— 20 good overcoming evil. Sacrifice and prayer, temple and altar, were known ; and sin and sin-oflTering were familiar ideas to the Aryans. A shadowy spirit existence after death was believed in ; heroes were taken to the halls of the gods, but the kingdom of Hades was the general abode of spirits, where the good and the evil got their deserts. Aryan Myths. We shall now see how the Aryans dealt in one or two cases with the actions of their gods, and how this gave rise to a mythi- cal life history of them in later times. It was around the sun- god that most of these myths were gathering. Off-spring of night, whom he slays, he loves the dawn maiden. Daphne — " rosy-fingered morn," who flies from his embrace over the azure plains of Heaven, but, Cinderella-like, leaves a golden streak of light behind her whereby she may be followed and found. The sun has his toils, too, in the pursuit ; storm-clouds intercept his path ; at times even the eclipse monster swallows him ; and he has to toil for mean creatures like men to give them light and heat, owing to the spells put upon him. But at length he over- takes, in the evening, his morning love, the dawn, now the even- ing dawn, who consoles him as he descends beneath the wave. In some such strains must the old Aryans have spoken of the sun's career and actions, and sung the praises of the Being who guided his flying coursers over the plains of Heaven. Later ages rational- ised the myth into the loves and actions of Apollo and Daphne, Hercules and Dejanira, and others innumerable. The myth is broken down to a folk-tale, which appears in a variety of modern forms, of which the fairy talc of Cinderella is the best example. Cinderella is the youngest, as usual, of three sisters — the night- watches ; she is in fact the dawn maiden ; she is pursued by the young prince, and leaves her glass slipper — her streak of light — behind her, by means of which she is identified at last This tale appears also in the Gaelic popular stories. A king's daughter has to fly with her fairy treasures — the peculiar thing is that these maidens have always treasures, and there generally is as much dispute about them as about the maidens themselves; these treasures appear to be connected with the rain clouds, the cows and cattle of the sun. The king's daughter takes service in the new land she arrives in ; goes to a ball, unknown to her employ- ers, in her fairy dress ; creates a sensation, so to speak ; but having to leave in haste, she loses her glass slipper, whereby the enamoured prince is enabled to find her. The talc of the " Hoodie Crow," with which our discussion commenced, would appear to be a broken down myth of the solar class ; and it is accordingly connected with the nocturnal life of the sun-god, who then is under the spell of the dark powers. The dawn maiden pursues him through toils and difficulties, and at last frees him from the spells. Another fruitful source of myth and worship is the change of summer into winter, when the earth has to pass from the genial rule of the " fire " powers to that of the " frost " king. The earth is spell-bound during winter, by the machinations of the frost-king ; the lovely goddess of summer has been carried away, leaving her mother Earth disconsolate ; " Proserpina gathering flowers, herself a fairer flower, by gloomy Dis is gathered." She ! becomes the wife of Pluto, god of the lower world, but is allowed I to return to her mother for half of the year. Connected with this myth is the widespread tale of the imprisoned maiden. There are always three characters in the myth ; the nionster or giant, who performs the abduction ; the maiden who is rich in treasures as well as beautiful ; and the youthful hero, the young Apollo, who is destined to overcome the monster and his spells. Some minor points may briefly be noticed. Among the many names of the sun in the Veda, he is called the "golden- handed," a very natural simile for the golden rays shooting finger- like from him. The Hindus accordingly rationalise this, and tell how Savitri cut ofl* his hand in a strait, and that the priests made a golden hand for him. The Norse god Tys (Zeus) had also his hand bitten off" by the Fcnris-wolf, and the Irish king of the De Dannans, Nuada of the Silver Hand, lost his hand in fight with the Firbolg giant, and the physician Diancet made him a silver one. Another wide-spread myth is to be referred to the same source ; the sun-god Apollo is the best of archers — the " Far- darter," of Homeric poetry. In nearly every Aryan nation there is a historical legend telling the doughty deecj of some great archer ; such is the story of Tell, in Switzerland, which is typical of the rest The legend appears in the German tale of Eigel, i 22 brother of Wayland, the smith-god ; while in Braemar it is circum- stantially told regarding the ancestor of the Machardies, also a " smith" family. Of myths arising from the wind, storm, thunder, earth, and sea, it is unnecessary to speak as yet; they will appear in their proper place among the folk-tales, and some — as the sea- deities, Lir and his children — among the myths of the heroes. Results of the General Principles. The peculiar characteristics of Mythology have now been indicated ; the cause of myth, and the wide diflusion of the same myths among different nations have been discovered respectively in the philosophy of primitive man, and the common descent of the chief European and Asiatic nations. It has been shown that the Aryan nation possessed what may be dignified with the name of a civilisation ; its culture and religion were of a very high type, though there were not wanting numerous traces of the culture of more primitive and ruder times. It now becomes our duty to follow the fortunes of the Mythology of one of the nations de- scended from this Aryan parent nation, and see how it shaped the common heritage. It may be set down as a general principle that the Celts ought not to have in their language, mythology, or customs, any features inconsistent with their Aryan descent ; they may have developed the outward and inward features of Aryan civilisation, according to the idiosyncracies of the Celtic race, but the essential Aryan characteristics ought still to be recognisable in the descen- dant Celtic languages and myths. Whatever we find in these must conform, regard being had to the development of Celtic peculiarities, to what we know to have been true of the myths and language of the parent Aryan tongue, or of those of one or two of the other Aryan nations. Anything in Celtic myth, language, or customs, inconsistent with an Aryan descent, or of a plainly non-Aryan character, must first of all be distrusted until its existence among the Celts, and them alone, has been es- tablished on indubitable grounds. Nor must explanations of Celtic phenomena be accepted which would imply relationship with races outside the Aryan stock — such as with the Semitic or Hebrew race, until clear historical or other proof is adduced. The a priori argument against such a connection is so strong that 23 special care must be exercised in allowing non-Aryan explana- tions to appear. It is needless to remark that until lately the Celts suffered much from the injudicious and unscientific theories of Celtic enthusiasts, and it has been only by the patient industry of the Germans that full recognition has been given to the proper position of the Celts among the other Indo-European nations. Even yet, in Scotland, too little attention is paid to the scientific facts established in Celtic ethnology and philology. For this state of matters there is now little excuse, moro especially as within the last year or two the results of Continental and British learning have been put before the public in the works of Mr Elton and Professor Rhys, to both of whom the present writer must express his great obligations. Sources of Information. Of the old Celtic nations — their culture and their religion — we have no native account No Celtic language has got any literary remains earlier than the seventh century at farthest, and even these are but glosses or marginal Gaelic equivalents of Latin words in manuscripts. The oldest manuscripts of connected works cannot be traced farther back than the eleventh century. By this period Christianity had asserted its sway, at least in name, and the old paganism remained only in the customs and the heroic and folk tales of the nation. What religion existed in Ireland and Britain a thousand years before this period of the oldest manuscripts must be discovered, if it can at aU, from some other source than contemporary native evidence. Yet we are not without a fair idea of what the old Celtic religion was. The sources of our information in deciphering what Professor Rhys has called "the weather worn history" of the Celts are these: Roman and Greek writers have left contemporary accounts of Celtic history, religion, and customs, though in the case of religion and customs, such accounts are scrappy indeed, and the history is generally a statement of contemporary actions and the relations of the Celts to the favoured races of Rome and Greece. Next to these come the monuments and in- scriptions of ancient Gaul and Britain. These comprise mostly the votive inscriptions to the deities, the statues, and the coin- age of th2 period. The names of places, especially of rivers, ; ( ' 24 have indicated Celtic localities, migrations, and religious beliefs; for how numerous are, for instance, the rivers with. the name Dee (goddess), showing the wide-spread worship of water and rivers among the Celts? Examination also of the rude stone monuments and the barrows of prc-historic times has elucidated much that is dark in Celtic history, while the ex- amination of physical characteristics in the race has helped even more to clear up difficulties of ethnology. A judicious use of the oldest heroic and folk talcs must divulge some secrets in re- gard to Mythology, if not to History; while modem folk-talcs and customs lend special aid in reflecting light on the past An intelligent scrutiny of the Roman calendar of saints will disclose a few more Celtic divinities in the realms of saintdom; for where the Church did not make demons or heroes of the ancient gods, it did the next best thing — it made saints of them. In the same way we can recognise Pagan festivals and customs in a Christian guise; the Church festivals are nearly all the result of assimilat- ing the existing religious customs. And, lastly, to steady our whole results, we have to remember that the Celts are an Aryan people, and that explanations of their customs and religions must follow the ordinary lines of the other Aryan nations. Where there are diflerences — and there are many such — these must be caused by the fact that the Celts assimilated with themselves an earlier population. Notice has already been taken of the Pictish law of succession, where descent is traced through the mother. This implies clearly a low view of the state of matrimony, and one clearly opposed to an Aryan source. We are therefore fairly justified in regarding the Picts as strongly admixed with a non- Aryan race. In thus reconstructing the past history of the Celts, at least three classes of savants are pressed into our service. First and foremost is the philologist, who has within the last generation or two completely revolutionised the science of ethnology. He has shown in the clearest manner possible the common descent of most of the European nations, at least as far as language is con- cerned, and that means a vast amount, for language is followed by a common mythology, and, in a less degree, by common cus- toms. The next savant we draw upon is the anthropologist, or, rather, the physiologist; he examines the remains of ancient man 25 and the characteristics of modern man, and classifies accordingly. And, thirdly, wc have the archaeologist, who examines prehistoric remains and implements. These three classes of workers do not well agree; Professor Huxley despises the ethnological results of linguistic science, while Professor Rhys does not conceal his con- tempt for those who decide on national descent by "skin and skull;" and Mr Ferguson will not leave his "rude stone monu- ments" to consider what either of them may say. Two such men as Mr Tylor and Mr Elton are, therefore, to the ordinary student, simply invaluable guides, from the fact that they attempt to combine the researches of all three. From the materials collected from these three sources, we shall proceed to give a short account of the Celts and their religion. The Celts. When or where the people lived who spoke the original Aryan tongue is not known with any certainty. " It seems pro- bable," says one writer, "that their home was somewhere in South-western Asia, and the time of their dispersion not less than three thousand years before Christ" Fick holds that they split up first into two parts, answering to the modem Asiatic and European Aryans. The European branch again broke up into two — the South-western European division and the Northern European division. The latter included the Slavonic (Russians and old Prussians), and the Teutonic (English, Germans, Norse, &c.) races ; while the Southern branch comprised the Greek, Latin, and Celtic races. The order in which they are enumer- ated above shows the order of their arrival in Europe ; first came the Celts leading the van of the Southern division, while the Sclavs brought up the rear of all. It has been remarked that for the purpose of attaining political greatness the Celts came too soon, the Sclavs too late. The line of Celtic migration across Europe has been traced in the names of places, especially the river names. The Don and the Dnieper would appear to prove that they crossed the Russian steppes. Yet there are evident traces of the Celts on the iEgean sea, which itself may be from the root of the Gaelic aigcan ; and we have the River Strumon on the Thracian coast, which is clearly Celtic from the existence of the X, which was lost in Greek itself; and we may add the famous D 26 Mount Pindus — the black mount (?)9 in Greece. In any case, however, be their route whatever we please, we find the Celts in the earliest records we have of them in possession of the greatest portion of Western Europe. At the time of their taking Rome in 390 B.C, the Celts would appear to have possessed, as they certainly did two centuries later, Northern Italy, France, Belgium, and part of Germany, most of Spain, Britain, and Ireland. How much of the middle of Europe they then held is unknown, but that they did possess part of what now is Germany is clear from the names of places, and also from the fact that the Germans have, in common with the Celts, many myths which must have then been absorbed by the Germans in absorbing the Celtic population. About 220 B.C the Romans conquered Northern Italy, a hundred years later they conquered the Mediterranean coast of France, and seventy years afterwards Csesar conquered the whole of France and completely crushed the Gallic power. That is briefly the political side of their history. But there are two points to notice in their internal history of special im- portance in the present inquiry. The Celts, in entering Europe, found the country inhabited, and this previous population, a non- Aryan one of course, they either exterminated or absorbed. It is, therefore, of vital importance to know as much as possible about this previous population, for, naturally, its customs, beliefs, and, in a much less degree, its language, were absorbed by the conquering Celt From the evidence of language and customs alone. Professor Rhys has, in his work on ** Celtic Britain," been able to prove the existence of a previous non-Celtic and non- Aryan population in Britain. The Pictish custom of succession already mentioned, and the continual reference in classical writers to some British nations who had community of wives — Caesar erroneously attributes this to all Britain alike, Celt and non-Celt — point to a low idea of matrimony that must have belonged to the previous population. Again, in the list of Kings given for the Picts, the names are not of an Aryan or Celtic type; Aryan names were always compounds, however much denuded by time, but these Pictish names are monosyllabic and unmeaning. The frequency of animal names in Pictish "districts has also been ad- duced as a proof in the same direction, though not a convincing argument, for most nations have animal names among their per- it sonal names. Mr Elton has pointed out some peculiar legal customs with regard to the right of the youngest son to succeed to the father's property, and these, he thinks, indicate a non- Aryan source. But the matter is rendered practically a certainty, if we summon to our aid the physiologist He finds the British nation divided into two or more races. These are, at the least, the small dark-skinned race and the fair-skinned race. ''All the Celts," says Mr Elton, "according to a remarkable consensus of authorities, were tall, pale, and light-haired." The dark-skinned race evidently belong to a different race from the Celts, and when we consider that Europe has been inhabited for several thousand years, and that men have existed here who used stone weapons, and thereafter bronze, before iron came into vogue, which it pro- bably did along with the Celts, we must believe that there was a race before the Celts in Europe, who used stone and bronze weapons. But the evidence does not stop here. From the con- tents of the barrows and tombs of the stone and bronze ages, it has been proved by the skeletons and skulls that there were two races at least previous to the Celts; one race being the dark- skinned and small one already mentioned, with long skulls; the other with fair skin and hair and broad skulls, a tall race, rough- featured, beetle-browed, with the nose overhung at its root, heavy cheek-bones, and prominent chin; these last differing much from the straight-faced, oval-headed men who are recog- nised as Celts and Aryans. The dark-skinned race of Britain is called the "Silurian," from the ancient tribe so named by Tacitus in the Vale of the Severn, and described by him 4s " Iberian" in appearance. The fair race Mr Elton designates the " Finnish," from its apparent Finnish or Ugrian affinities. The Picts would appear to be for the most part of this race, doubtless, with a strong admixture in after times of the pure Celtic stock. The archaeologist, unfortunately, cannot help us much, but it is be- lieved that this Finnish race were the builders of the huge stone monuments scattered all over Europe — dolmens, cromlechs, and Druid circles, while the barrows of both the ante-Celtic races exist The influence exerted by these previous races on Celtic customs and religion must doubtless have been considerable. " The strangeness of the * lower mythology* prevailing in Wales and Britanny might afford some evidence in favour of its pre« 28 Celtic origin. But no country in Europe is free from those gross superstitions which seem to indicate an underworld of barbarism and remnants of forgotten nations not wholly permeated by the culture of the dominant races." Professor Rhys goes so far as to refer Druidism to the Silurian race, because Caisar mentions Britain as the birthplace of that cultus, and it is of a character which he considers non-Aryan. It is almost certain that second- sight and other ecstatic moods must be referred to the pre-Celtic races. Welsh and Gaels. The second point in the internal history of the Celts is the fact that the race is divided into two great divisions, caused by the languages used by each. The difference between Welsh and Gaelic is very great, yet not so great as to preclude their being classed as one race, making up one of the Aryan branches. The difference between the two languages can be traced as far back as history goes, and, by monuments and inscriptions can be fol- lowed back for two thousand years, when still the Gaelic race was very different in language from the Welsh or British. It would appear that the Celts overran Europe in two successive waves of conquest The first wave was the Gaelic one ; it was followed by the Welsh — we may rather call it the Gaulish wave. The Gauls push the Gaels from France into Britain and Ireland, and then followed them into Britain. When British history begins with the Christian era, France and Belgium were Gaulish or Welsh-speaking, and so also was the Eastern part of England, and the Scotch Lowlands ; while Cornwall and Devon, most of Wales, Cumberland, Galloway, and the surrounding counties, north of the Forth, and all Ireland belonged to the Gaels. It must be remembered that a good portion of the population north of the Grampians were probably non-Celtic. By the end of the seventh century of this era no Gael lived in England ; the British tribes had been driven back to the corners of the country by the Saxons, and they absorbed the old Gaelic population. Ireland was still altogether Celtic, and so remained practically till the 13th century and later. The last wave of the Celts was in its turn pressed on from two sides. First the Romans overran and garrisoned Gaul, and then England, which they kept for four hundred years, much as s 29 1 I wc keep India at present Then the Teutonic nations pressed J on France from the north, conquered it and were absorbed ; while in England they conquered and absorbed the old popula- J I tion, leaving the old Welsh population to the western shores I ; The eastern portion of Ireland was conquered and settled in, and the rest has been gradually falling under the sway of the English tongue. The Celtic speaking peoples at present are the Bretons of Britanny, the Welsh, the Irish, and the Highlanders. The total number who can understand a Celtic tongue is, according to M. Scbillot, three millions and a-half (R€i\ Celt^ /V., ^jS). Celtic Characteristics. Of the physical characteristics of the Celts, except to show unity or diversity of descent, it would be needless to speak in dis- cussing their Mythology ; but there are so many Irish legends bearing upon the early ethnology of these islands, with continual reference to small dark men,tall brown-haired and fair-haired races^ that it is necessary to at least glance at the question. The unan- imity of ancient opinion in making the Celts tall and fair-hsured has already been noticed, and in the myths the ideal of beauty is, as a rule, what is told of the summer isles of the West, where dwelt a divine race of the pure Celtic type, " long-faced, yellow-haired hunters" and goddesses with hair like gold or the flower of the broom. Another type of beauty was recognised : Pcredur or Percival of Wales, as well as the lady Deirdre of Irish story, would have no consort unless the hair was black as the raven's wing, the skin as white as snow, and the two red spots in the checks as red as the blood of the bird which the raven was eating in the snow. But, " if you look at the Celtic countries," says the author of " Loch-Etive and the Sons of Uisnach,** " that is, countries in which Celtic was spoken in old time, or is spoken now, you find a predominance of dark hair." There would seem, therefore, to have been a decided change in the colour of the hair among the Celts since the times of Caesar and Tacitus ; but whether this is due to mingling of races or is connected with a higher nervous activity, for fair-haired children become dark- ' haired as the nervous system becomes more active by years, is a i question which, though important for the mythologist to know in its bearing on the migration and borrowing of myths and i 30 manners, yet cannot be decided in the present state of knowledge. We have still among us the remnants of the small dark people, and, if Professor Rhys is right, the Highlands must mostly in race be of the fair Finnish type that anteceded the Celts, with just sufficient of the Celtic conqueror among them as to take his language and general manners. There is, however, a more wonderful agreement in the mental characteristics formerly attributed to the Celts with what we now regard as the Celtic character. Roman writers have noticed their wonderful quickness of apprehension, their impressibility and great craving for knowledge, qualities which have rendered the Celt a very assimilable being in the fusion of races. They were generous to a degree ; prompt in action, but not very capable of sustained effort Caesar is never tired speaking of the " mobilitas'' — changeablcncss — of the Gauls, and also of their "celerity," both mental and physical. Another feature noticed from tiie very first, and still noticeable in the Celts, is their fondness for colour ; " loudness," we might say, both in colour and sound, musical or other, has been especially attractive to them. They appear in flaming tartan dresses before the walls of Rome in 390 RC, as we see from both Livy and Virgil. "They wear," says Diodorus Siculus, a writer of the ist century, "bracelets and armlets, and round their necks thick rings, all of gold, and costly finger rings, and even golden corselets ; they have dyed tunics, flowered with colours of every kind, and striped cloaks fastened with a brooch, and divided into numerous many-coloured squares." In this description we have the tartan, but unfortunately the kilt had not yet made its appearance; the Gauls and ancient Britons actually wore tartan trousers ! Their love of ornament and colour appears strongly in the mythic tales equally of Wales, Ireland, and the Highlands ; indeed, so rich is the description in one Welsh tale that at the end of it we are told that " no one knows the 'Dream of Rhonabwy' without a book, neither bard nor gifted seer; because of the various colours that were on the' horses, and the many wondrous colours of the arms, and of the panoply and of the precious scarfs, and of the virtue-bearing stones." We can trace among the Celts the same succession of politi« cal life that we find in some of the other Aryan nations, notably SI the Greeks and the Romans. The patriarchal system of Aryan times had given place on European soil to kings, who were merely larger editions of the patriarch of old. They were kings of the Homeric type ; for the Irish kings are not accurately represented in the lives of the saints as Pharaohs surrounded with Druids and magicians. The king consulted the chiefs beneath him, and the people, after this consultation, were told <^ his pleasure, but could only, apparently, murmur approval or dis- approval. In the course of time, the chiefs abolished the kingly power, and conducted matters themselves as an oligarchy, often cruelly oppressing the common people. In Greece, the oligarchy was overthrown by some clever man who sided with the common people and, through them, made himself " tyrant," as they called it The last step was the abolition of tyranny and the setting up of a democracy. Rome shows much the same historical sequence, only the tyrant does not appear; the oligarchy extended some privileges to the commons, and a sort of union was established, which, however, in the end, failed, and gave place to an Imperial sway. Among the Gauls we have distinct traces of all these phen- omena, " though," as Professor Rhys says, " no Gaulish Herodotus or Livy was found to commit them to the pages of histoiy.** Gaul would appear to have just passed through the stage when tyrants and oligarchs were struggling with the people; for Caesar found everywhere "the sulking and plotting representatives of the fallen dynasties, and readily turned them into use, either in bringing information about what was going on in the senates of the peoples who had expelled their ancestors from the office of king, or in keeping their states in subjection by appointing them kings in the room of their fathers and under Roman protectipn.** No wonder then that Caesar tells us that Gaul was torn asunder by factions. Britain had yet retained its kings, and appears to have lost them only when the Island was conquered by the Romans. Ireland had its five kings even within historic times; and the history of Scotland during the Stuart period shows how nearly an oligarchy came to rule this country. The old Celtic population of both Gaul and Britain appears to have been very prosperous. They were excellent farmers, but their chief riches lay in their cattle ; and their food, especially in Britain, was mostly flesh, milk, and cheese. Posidonius, in the first century before Christ, has left us a description of a Gaulish banquet which is important as reflecting light on the myths and tales of later Irish times. He was delighted at the antique sim- plicity of his entertainers, and amused at their Gallic frivolity and readiness for fighting at meal times. " They were just like the people in Homer's time." The guest was not asked his name or the purpose of his journey until the feast was over. They sat on a carpet of rushes or on the skins of animals in front of little tables. There was plenty of meat, roast and boiled, which they ate, after the fashion of lions, gnawing the joint, but they would at times use their small bronze knives, kept in a separate sheath by the side of the sword. Beer was their drink, which they poured through their long moustaches like water through a sieve or funnel " The minstrels sang and the harpers played, and, as the company drank, they bowed to the right in honour of their god. The guests sat in three rings — nobles, shield-bearers, and javelin-men — all in order of their precedence." If they quarrelled about the food, they would get up and fight it to the death; and sometimes the guests were entertained with swordplay, and sometimes even a man would consent to die to amuse the rest, so careless were they of life. Their conduct and ap- pearance in battle and in the chase is no less important for us to notice. " We seem," says Mr Elton, " to see the Brigan- tian soldier, with his brightly-painted shield, his pair of javelins and his sword hilt 'as white as the whale's-bone': his matted hair supplied the want of a helmet, and a leather jerkin served as a cuirass. When the line of battle was formed, the champions ran out to insult and provoke the foe ; the chiefs rode up and down on their white chargers shining in golden breast- plates, others drove the war chariots along the front, with soldiers leaning out before their captain to cast their spears and hand- stones : the ground shook with the prancing of horses, and the noise of the chariot wheels. We are recalled to scenes of old Irish life which so strangely reproduce the world of the Greek heroes and the war upon the plains of Troy.* We see the hunters following the cry of the hounds through the green plains and sloping glens; the ladies at the feast in the woods, the game roasting on the hazel-spits, * fish and flesh of boar and badger,* and the great bronze cauldrons at the fireplace in the cave. The J t 33 hero, Cuchulain, passes in his chariot brandishing the heads of the slain ; he speaks with his horses, the Gray and * Dewy- Red/ like Achilles on the banks of Scamander. The horses, in Homeric fashion, weep tears of blood and fight by their master's side ; his sword shines redly in his hand, the * light of valour* hovers round him, and a goddess takes an earthly form to be near him and to help him in the fray." The Gaulish Religion. The religion of the Gauls is the only Celtic religion of which we have any description, such as it is, left Now, we should be justified in assuming that the Gaulish religion is fairly representa- tive of what the old religion of the British and Irish Celts was, even though we had not Tacitus' direct testimony to this being the case. The descriptions we have of the Gaulish religion arc sufficiently meagre. Three chapters of Caesar, a few lines from Diodorus, Mela, and Strabo, some scattered allusions in Pliny, five lines from Lucan, and a statement from the Greek XiS*^" genes reproduced in Ammianus MarcelHnus, are practically all our authorities. The statues and inscriptions preserved to our time arc almost our only authority for the names of the deities;. while the calendar of the Church saints, local festivities and tradi- tions, render some little help in this and also in matters of ritual. Cnesar's sketch of the Gaulish pantheon, though meagre, is yet the best We owe it entirely to the fact that for practical purposes the Gaulish religion was much the same as the Roman, with the exception of Druidism, which he doubtless saw would be a source of danger, unless it could be assimilated to Roman ideas and practices. We are, therefore, prepared, from our knowledge of the Aryan descent of the Celts, to believe what Caesar says when he writes that the ideas of the Gauls with regard to the gods were much the same as those of other nations, meaning especially Romans and Greeks. . He tells us that the god most worshipped was Mercury ; that is to say, the Gaulish god was not named Mercury, but corresponded in his attributes to that Roman deity. Cnesar, unfortunately, does not record the native names for these deities. They regarded Mercury as the in- ventor of arts, presiding over trade and commerce, and means of communication between people. After him came the deities K 34 answering to the Roman Apollo, Mars, Jupiter, and Minerva ; Apollo drove away diseases, Minerva taught the useful arts of life, Jupiter held the sway of Heaven, and Mars ruled the depart- ment of war. To Mars they would vow what they should capture in war, and when they conquered they would sacrifice the cattle, and heap up the other wealth in mounds, in consecrated places, and no one would dare touch or steal these treasures, both from fear of the gods and from the extreme cruelty of the punishment that would follow detection. C.xsar also notices a feature of Celtic character which is still persistent in the race. The nation, he says, is very much given to religious matters. And on this account, he proceeds, those who are affected with diseases of a rather serious character, and those who are in great dangers, either sacrifice human beings, or make a vow to that effect ; and at these sacrifices they employ the Druids. They think, he says, that the Deity cannot be appeased unless human life is given up for human life, and they have even national sacrifices of this kind. They make huge images of wickerwork, inside which they place human beings alive ; and this they set on fire,and the victims perish. Generally the victims are criminals, but if criminals are wanting, they have recourse to innocent persons. These human sacrifices seem horrible to our modern minds, and to the Romans, though familiar with the idea of human sacrifice,' for in the time of the Second Punic war, they, themselves, resorted in their re- ligious terror to the sacrificing of a male and female Gaul, and it was not until the 1st century before Christ that the Senate for- mally forbade such sacrifices even in Rome — to the Romans even the Gauls appeared reckless in their massacres, such occurring, too, when there did not appear to be any special danger. Strabo says that it was a tenet of the Druids that the harvest would be rich in proportion to the richness of the harvest of death. Another article of the Gaulish creed is given by Caesar. The Gauls, he says, assert that they are all sprung from Pluto (the god of the lower world), for so the Druids teach. Hence, therefore, they reckon by nights instead of days. In regard to the belief which Caesar records, it is probably only a mythical way of recording a belief common to most nations in their bar- barous state, that they are the aboriginal inhabitants and sprung from the soil on which they dwell. As to the Gauls reckoning 36 blacken the heavens with clouds and wind, or drive in the temp- est with chariot and horses of fire." The Irish Dinn-Scnchus mentions this " thunder" god as ** Etirun, an idol of the Britons." Two other names of deities are preserved to us in the classical writers. Lucian speaks of a sort of Gaulish Hercules, represented as an old man drawing a large multitude after him by cords fas- tened to their ears and his tongue, and he was their god of letters and eloquence, and they called him Ogmios. This name appears afterwards as that of the Irish sacred or runic alphabet, so named from its inventor, Ogma, the son of Elathan, evidently a degraded deity. Again, one or two other writers mention the god Bclenus, a name common in inscriptions and in proper names of persons. The inscriptions also give, according to the Gallo-Romanic habit, the Latin God as well, with whom he was identified : we have such a combination often as Bclenus Apollo, thus making him the equivalent to the Roman sun and healing-god. This Belenus is the famous deity of the Druids according to the school of Neo- Druidists, the investigators into the system of the Druids, lately rampant among us. As a rule, Belenus, or rather Bel, as he was called by them, was identified with the Phenician Baal, and no end of theories were started on such suppositions. The word Belenus may, however, be from the same root as Apollo, and probably is from that root, as Mr Moberly has pointed out in his notes to Caesar. That his worship was connected with solar rites is evident from the manner in which Ausonius describes his temple at I3ayeux ; but he was also especially connected with health-giving waters and herbs, and was worshipped at medicinal resorts under various local titles, the most important of which are Borvo (I^ourbon) and Grannus. The latter title is doubtless connected with the Gaelic grian^ sun, and it is interesting to note that an altar was once found at Invcresk with the inscription, •* ApoUini Granno," which clearly shows the worship of this sun- god in ancient Scotland. It is probably in connection with the service of Belenus that the cutting of the mistletoe took place, as related by Pliny. The passage is given either in full or in abstract in almost all our school books of history, and it is there wrongly given out as a " Druidic " rite. It is merely a case of herb worship, common to all nations. The mistletoe is far more famous in Teutonic Mythology, and the gallant rites at modern 37 Christmascs arc merely a remembrance of its ancient efficacy as a preserver and defender from harm. Pliny tells us that on the sixth day of the moon, the commencement of the Gaulish month, a Druid or priest, clothed in white, mounted the tree and cut the plant with a golden sickle. It was received on a white cloth, and two white bulls were sacrificed, while the people burst forth in prayer for the favour of the god. The mistletoe was supposed \ thus to be a cure for sterility, and a safeguard against poisons. This is just merely a form ol fetishism. The Gaulish inscriptions give us quite a host of minor deities. The Roman system of assimilating conquered peoples appears extremely well in these inscriptions; in nearly every case the Roman deity is given as the principal name to which is attached as epithet the local Gaulish equivalent. We, therefore, meet with combinations like these: "Marti Segomoni," "Marti Caturigi," "Mercurio Artaio," "lovi Bagniati," "Apollini Virotuti,"' etc The Gaulish and British goddess, Belisama, is the most important to notice; she answered to the Latin Minerva, goddess of arts, who, along with " Mercury," was the most human of all the deities of Gaul. The goddesses of the healing springs were honoured as the companions of Apollo. " Divine beings everywhere mediated between man and heaven." Fountains, rivers, and hills had their deities, and the sea-nymph of the Breton shore is still revered under the title of St Anne. Every village was protected by local deities, with the generic title of " Matris" or " Mothers," names which appear in great numbers on the inscriptions, and which survive, we are told, in mediaeval legends as the White Ladies, the " Three Fairies," the Weird Sisters, and the Wild Women of the Woods. Some, again, of the lesser deities appear as the giants of our folk-tales. Such has been the fate of "Gargantua," an old Gaulish deity of Normandy, whose festivals are not un- known yet, and whose fame appears on the pages of Rabelais. There were also innumerable private or family gods, answering to the Roman Penates and Lares, of whom inscriptions and statues testify. Druidism. One feature of the Gaulish religion still remains to 1x5 discus- sed, and that, too, perhaps its most important one. We have dis- cussed the religious beliefs of the people, but not their ecclesias- 38 tical polity. This is known as Druidism, although that term is commonly made to include all that we know of the Gaulish religion as well. But the Druids were rather the philosophers and divines of the Gauls; and, as what we know of their opinions and practices is somewhat remarkable, it is better not to confuse their system with the ordinary Aryan religion of the Gauls. Here, again, it must be repeated that our information is meagre ; in fact, with regard to the Druids no less meagre, and far more unsatisfactory than our comparatively poor information about their general religion. Indeed, with the addition of two chapters in Caesar, a sentence in Cicero, and nigh a dozen lines of Lucan,^our authorities for Druidism are included in the enumera- tion already made in regard to Gaulish religion in general. No monuments or inscriptions can help us, nor can we trust in the slightest degree the references made to Druidism by early Irish or Welsh writers : the Druids of Irish history are mere conjurors and magicians. Neither can any customs or religious survivals be referred to Druidic belief or usage. But it may be at the start premised that there is, perhaps, little to know, and that it is en- tirely due to Caisar's account of them, probably itself somewhat exaggerated in its political aspect, and certainly misread by modern writers under the influence of their knowledge of medi- ;uval ccclesiasticism, that this exaggerated opinion of Druidism is prevalent So little is known, and the little that is known is so interesting, that it opened quite a new world for fancies and speculations. " Omne ignotum pro magnifico est ;" the unknown passes for the magnificent. Here was an unknown and un- knowable land, where in circular temples of stone, and mid groves of oak, in vestments of stainless white, and ornaments of glittering gold, stalked majestically the Druids, holding high converse with their disciples on the nature of the one God — for such philosophers could only be monotheists! — on the immortality of the soul, the courses of the stars, and, in fact, on all the mighty problems of life. Dr Smith tells us that they alone kept the first tradition of monotheism intact in the West; and Reynaud, but a generation ago, found in their human sacrifices only the conse- quence of the idea, dominant now as in the days of the Druids, that the higher the victim the more complete the atonement offered to the Deity for the sins of man. John Toland, at the 39 end of the 17th century, an Irishman of fertile imagination and advanced opinions, possessed of no small learning, was the first to lead the way into the undiscovered country of Druidism. The references in Pliny were made to disclose a pomp and ritual that could vie with the best days of the Church of Rome ; surplices of white — incidentally worn, as may be seen from Pliny — were their usual dress, with golden ornaments, sacrifice utensils and amulets, all of gold. The megalithic monuments — circles, cromlechs, and menhirs, were of course their work — their temples and their altars, and these also showed their knowledge of the mechanical powers. Nay, cairns and barrows were Druidic remains, and vitrified forts ! Everything unexplained in archaeological monu- ments, in social customs, and in proverbial language must be Druidic. Dr Smith, of the " Seann Dana," followed Toland and made a most unscrupulous use of his classical authorities. Welsh and French writers took the same view of the old religion of Gaul, and Celtomania reigned supreme in this obscure region, until lately the light of modern criticism was allowed to shine through the overhanging mist of nonsensical speculation. All that can with certainty be known of the Druids will first be briefly given, apart from any personal theories. Caesar is again our first and best authority. In the digression in his 6th book, on the manners and customs of the Gauls and Germans, he tells us that all men of any consideration or position were included among either the Druids or the nobles. The Druids conduct public and private sacrifices, and interpret omens. Young men flock to them for instruction ; and they are held in great honour, for they have the decision of all controversies, public and private; they are judges in cases of crime, murder, and disputes in regard to succession or boundaries ; and whoever abides not by their decision is excommunicated — a most severe punishment, for such are reckoned sacrilegists, and men flee from their presence for fear of disaster from contact with them. A chief Druid presides over them, having supreme authority. He may be elected with or without voting, and they at times resort to war to decide the matter. They meet at an appointed time of the year in the ter- ritories of the Carnutes, in the middle of Gaul, where there is a consecrated place; and there all come who have disputes, and abide by their decisions. It is thought that the system was found 40 in Britain, and thence transferred to Gaul, and those who at the present time wish to know it thoroughly, as a rule proceed there to learn it The Druids are wont to hold aloof from war, and pay no taxes, being thus free from military service and civil duties. Under the inducement of such great rewards, many come themselves into their ranks, or are sent by their parents and friends. With them they learn off a great number of lines of poetry, so that some remain under training for twenty years. And they do not regard it allowable by divine laws to commit these things to writing, though in secular matters they use Greek letters. The reason for this seems to be twofold, that they do not wish either their system to be made public, or their pupils to fail to cultivate their memory by trusting to writing, as generally happens when books can be resorted to. Their chief doctrine is that souls do notjgcrish^imt pass after death from one individual to another, "and this — the removal of the fear of death — they think the greatest incitement to viilQun They theorise largely on astronomy, on the ^e of the universe and the earth, on nature, and on the power and might of the gods, and in these matters they instruct the youth. Caisar further on tells that the Druids presided at the human sacrifices, and in the 7th book he gives us to know that the >Eduan magistrates, at least, were elected by them. Cicero, in his treatise on " Divination," written a few years later, introduces his brother Quintus as saying : " The principles of divination arc not overlooked among barbarous nations even, as, for instance, in Gaul there are the Druids, one of whom Divitiacus, the iCduan, I knew ; he was a guest of yours and great in your praises. He professed to know natural philosophy, which the Greeks call 'physiology,' and he used to tell partly by augury, partly by conjecture, what was to happen in the future." Cicero's contem- porary, Diodorus Siculus, tells us that among the Gauls were bards, certain philosophers and divines named Druids, and sooth- sayers, adding that " the system of Pythagoras held sway among them," that is, the doctrine of the transmigration of souls. To this doctrine V^alerius Maximus refers when he says: " One would have laughed at these long-trousered philosophers [the Druids], if we had not found their doctrine under the cloak of Pythagoras." Strabo, his contemporary, in the first century of our era, gives us a short account of the Druids, half of which is but a variation of I 41 I Caesar's sketch. ** Amongst the Gauls" he says, "there are generally three divisions of men, especially reverenced, the Bards, the Vates, and the Druids. The bards composed and chanted hymns ; the Vates occupied themselves with the sacrifices and the study of nature; while the Druids joined to the study of nature that of moral philosophy. The belief in their justice is so great that the decision both of public and private disputes is referred to them, and they have before now by their decision pre- vented battle. All cases of murder are particularly referred to them. When there are plenty of these they imagine there will be a plentiful harvest Both these and the others [Bards and Vates] assert that the soul is indestructible and likewise the world, but that fire and water will one day have the mastery.*' And further on he says that without the Druids the Gauls never sacrifice. • Another geographer, Pomponius Mela, refers to the Druids, but adds nothing to our knowledge, merely echoing Caesar's de- scription. Lucan, who died in 65, has been quoted in the former section for the names of the Gaulish gods ; but he further pro- ceeds to describe, after a reference to the Bards, the barbarous rites of the Druids and their theology. The passage is mostly an \ expansion of Cncsar's reference to the transmigration of souls, but the poet beautifully brings out how ** IMuto's gloomy reign" is not the habitation of souls, but that — ** Forth they fly immortal in their kind. And other bodies in new worlds they find ; Thus life for ever runs its endless race. And like a line death but divides the space. Thrice happy they beneath their northern skies. Who that worst fear — the fear of death — despise ; Hence they no cares for this frail lieing feel. Hut rush undaunted on the pointed steel ; Provoke approaching fate and bravely scorn To spare that life which must so soon return. " The writer on the Druids, next in importance to Ca;sar, is Pliny the Elder. He has several interesting allusions to them and their superstitions. At the end of his 16th book he mentions the admiration of the Gauls for the mistletoe. ** The Druids," he says " (for so they name their viagi) hold nothing more sacred than the mistletoe, and the tree on which it grows, provided it be the oak. They choose groves of that tree, and conduct no sacri- 43 Ace without a garland of its leaves, so that we may possibly suppose the Druids are so called from its Greek name [t/ms], WTiatever grows on the oak is considered a gift from heaven." And he proceeds to tell how it was culled from the tree, as has already been told. Pliny mentions other plant superstitions of the Gauls, connecting the rites naturally enough with the Druids who presided. The next important /etis/i he mentions is the club-moss (selago) ; it must be touched by no metal, but plucked by the right hand passed through the tunic under the left, with a thievish gesture ; the worshipper must be dressed in white, with feet washed and bare ; and the plant must be carried in a new cloth. The Druids held that it was a charm against all misfortunes, and the smoke of its burning leaves cured diseases of the eye. In much the same way they thought the " samolus," or water pim- pernel, a talisman against murrain in cattle. Vervain was another plant, "about which the Gaulish ;;/^^/ raged," which cured everything, and had to be gathered at the rise of the dog-star, and when neither sun nor moon was seen. But these plant superstitions and ceremonies have nothing especially " Druidic" about them; they are common among other nations as well. Pliny's account of the serpent's egg — the anginnum — is more im- portant and special. The snake's egg was said to be produced from the frothy sweat of a number of serpents writhing in an entangled mass, and to be tossed up into the air as soon as formed. The Druid who was fortunate enough to catch it in his cloak as it fell rode off at full speed, pursued by the serpents, until stopped by a running stream. If tried, the egg would swim in water though cased in gold. Pliny says he saw one himself, " about the size of a moderately large apple, with a cartilaginous rind, studded with cavities like the arms of a polypus." A Roman knight was making use of it in court to gain an unfair verdict, and for this was put to death by Claudius the Emperor. And, lastly, in speaking of magic and its "vanities," he says that "Britain celebrates them to-day with such ceremonies that it might seem possible that she taught magic to the Persians," and " Gaul was overrun with magic arts even up to our own time, until Tiberius Caesar did away with the Druids and this class of prophets and medicine-men." This passage has puzzled many commentators, for if the Druids were done away with, how docs 43 Pliny elsewhere mention them as still existent in Gaul ? And to add to the difficulty, Suetonius, a generation later, says that " Claudius abolished entirely the religion of the Druids, a religion of dreadful barbarity, and forbidden only the Roman citizens under Augustus." Pliny and Suetonius do not agree as to which Emperor abolished Druidism, nor can we well believe that it was altogether abolished even then : it would appear that only the human sacrifices and certain modes of divination were put a stop to. Strabo, indeed, says as much; and we can see from Tacitus that the prophecies of the Druids incurred political wrath as late as Vespasian's time — after the abolition of Druidism, according to Pliny. Human sacrifices and, probably, meddling in politics were sure to bring the wrath of Rome on the system. Tacitus gives us an insight of how at times the Romans did put a stop to these phases of Druidism. In describing the attack of the Romans on Mona, or Anglcsea, he represents the legions as awe-struck by the appearance of the Druids amid their opponents' ranks, pour- ing curses and vengeance on their heads, with hands upraised to heaven. But they were rolled in their own fires, and the groves sacred to grim superstitions were cut down ; " for," he adds, " they hold it lawful to sacrifice captives at their altars and to consult the gods from the movements of human entrails." After the first century, writers speak of Druidism as a thing of the past ; evidently the decrees of the Emperors had done away with its fiercer elements of superstition, and the purer and more philo- sophical parts had been absorbed into the usual Roman faith. Christianity, at least, had no contest with Druidism either in Gaul or in England. It may be mentioned that Ammianus Marcellinus, in the fourth century, gives us a few lines on the old and long extinct Druidism. After noticing the foundation of Marseilles by a Phocean colony, he says that when the people in those parts got gradually civilised, the learned studies which had been begun by the bards, the Euhages (probably a corruption of Vatcs) and the Druids, throve vigorously. Of these, he says, the Druids were the intellectual superiors of the others, and were formed into unions in accordance with the precepts of l*ythagoras, where deep and hidden problems were discussed, and looking from a lofty philosophic pinnacle on human aflairs, they pro- nounced human souls immortal. 44 Such is the history of Druidism in Gaul and early Britain : of its course in Ireland we have no direct information. It is only when Christianity has been long established, and Druidism a thing of the remote past, that we have writers who speak of the Druids ; and in their eyes the Druids were but magicians that attended the courts of the pagan kings. The lives of the pioneer saints, Patrick and Columba, are full of contests between them- selves and the royal magicians, who are called in the Gaelic Dnu'dsLtid in the Latin versions Ma^y. But in all the numerous references to them in Irish chronicles and tales there is no hint given of Druidism being cither a system of philosophy or re- ligion : the Druids of Irish story are mere magicians and diviners, sometimes only conjurors. But as such — as magicians — the Druids play a most important part in Irish pagan history, as chronicled by the long posterior Christian writers. From the primaeval landing of Partholan with his three Druids, to the days of Columba, we have themselves and the bards exercising magic and divining powers. The second fabled settlers of Ireland, the Nemedians, meet the invading Fomorians with magic spells ; but the fairy host of the Tuatha De Dannan are ^ar excellence the masters of Druidic art. Their power over the forces of Nature — over sea, wind, and storms — shows them plainly to be only de- graded gods, who allow the sons of Miled to land after showing them their power and sovereignty as deities over the island. The kings and chiefs had Druids about them to interpret omens and to work spells ; but there is no reference to these Druids being a priestly class, and their power was limited to the functions of mere divination and sorcery. Two of the most famous Druids were Cathbadh, Druid of Conchobar Mac Nessa, the instructor of Cuchulain, who, among many other things, foretells the fate of Deirdrc and the sons of Uisnach, even before Deirdre was bom ; and Mogh Ruith of Munster, who single-handed opposed Cor- mac and his Druids, and drove them by his magic fire and storm- spells out of Munster. The Druids of King Loegaire oppose St Patrick with their magic arts ; one of them causes snow to fall so thickly that men soon find themselves ncck-decp in it, and at another time he brings over the land an Egyptian darkness that might be felt. But the saint defeats them, even on their own ground, much as Moses defeats the Egyptian magicians. St 45 Columba, in Adamnan's life of him,' is similarly represented as overcoming the spells of the Northern Druids. Broichan, Druid to King Brudc, caused such a storm and darkness on Loch-Ness that the navigation appeared impossible, until the saint gave orders that the sails should be unfurled and a start made. Then everything became calm and settled. We are also told in many instances how the Druids worked these spells. A wisp of hay, over which an incantation was made, when cast on a person, caused idiocy and deformity. The Druidic wand plays an im- portant part, a blow from it causing transformations and spells. It must be remarked, too, that the wood used for wands and Druidic rites and Hres was not the oak at all, as in Gaul : sacred wood among the Irish Druids would appear to have been the yew, hawthorn, and, more especially, the rowan tree. Divination was an important feature of Druidic accomplishments, and there were various forms of it Pure Druidic divination sometimes consisted in watching the Druidic fire — how the smoke and flame went. Sometimes the Druid would chew a bit of raw flesh with incantation or " oration" and an invocation to the gods, and then generally the future was revealed to him. Sometimes, if this failed, he had to place his two hands upon his two cheeks and fall into a divine sleep, a method known as " illumination by the palms of the hands." Fionn used to chew his thumb when he wanted any supernatural knowledge. The bards, too, were di- viners at times, a fact that would appear to show their ancient connection with the Druids. The bardic divination is known as " illumination by rhymes," when the bard in an ecstatic state pours forth a flood of poetry, at the end of which he brings out the particular fact that is required to be known. Connected with this is the power of poetic satire. If a man refused a gift, the bard could satirise him in such a way that personal injury would result, such as blisters and deformities. Irish Druidism consists, therefore, merely of magic and divination ; it is not a philosophy, nor a religion, nor a system. It is quite true that we have, at least, an echo now and then of the time when Druidism in Ireland and Scotland was something different, and when even human sacrifices were offered. Columba, ll^ in commencing the building of his church at lona, addressed his \ followers in words which clearly point to human sacrifice. "It is 46 good for us," says he, " that our roots should go under the earth j here ; it is permitted that one of you should go under the clay of y this island to hallow it" The story goes on to say that Odran arose readily, and spoke thus : " If thou shouldst take me, I am ready for that" Columba readily accepted his offer, and " then Odran went to heaven, and Columba founded the church of Hi." It is said that a human being was slain at the foundation of Emain, the m>'thic capital of Ulster ; and in Ncnnius we have a remarkable story told of King Vortigern. He was trying to build a castle on Snowdon, but somehow, though he gathered ever so much material, every time it was " spirited" away during the night He sought counsel from his " magi" (the Irish trans- lation calls them Druids), and they told him that he must find a child bom without a father, and must put him to death, and sprinkle with his blood the ground where the castle was to stand. Nor is tradition of the present time silent on this matter. It is said that Tigh-a-chnuic, Kilcoy, in the Black Isle, had its founda- tion consecrated by the slaughter of a stranger who chanced to be passing when the house was to be built, but unfortunately his ghost used to haunt the house until he was able to disburden his woes to somebody, and he then disappeared. The sum and result of our inquiry into Druidism may be given in the words of Professor Rhys : — " At the time of Caesar's invasions, they were a powerful class of men, monopolizing the influence of soothsayers, magicians, and priests. But in Gaul, under the faint rays of the civilization of Marseilles and other Mediterranean centres, they seem to have added to their other characters that of philosophers, discoursing to the youths, whose education was entrusted to them, on the stars and their move- ments, on the world and its countries, on the nature of things, and the power of the gods." WTiether the doctrine of the trans- migration of souls was really of native origin or borrowed from the Greeks, must remain an open question. Some think it un-i likely that the central doctrine of Druidism should have been derived so late in the history of the nation, or derived at all, from a foreign source, and they appeal to the fact that Britain was the home of Druidism, a country which could have had little inter- course with Marseilles. But in connection with this idea of its British origin, it must be remembered that at a certain stage of 47 culture, nations are apt to consider their neighbours, provided they are in a lower stage of civilization, much more religious than themselves. The Romans always believed the Etrurians to be more versed in religious matters than themselves. So, too, the Gauls probably looked on British Druidism, with its "pristine grimness" of practices, as the source of their own, while in reality their own was doubtless an independent but more enlightened development Professor Rhys considers Druidism to be of a non-Aryan character, and calls it the religion of the pre-Celtic tribes, from the Baltic to Gibraltar. Now, in what we have left us recorded of Druidism there is absolutely nothing that can be pointed to as non-Aryan. The strong priestly caste presented to us in Caesar, as divided off from the nobles and the commons, can be somewhat paralleled in the Hinduism of India with its rigidly priestly caste of Brahmans, who monopolised all religious rites. And Brahmanism is an Aryan religion. Among the Gauls, from the superstitious cast of their minds, a priestly class was sure to rise to a position of supreme power. Their human sacrifices can be matched, in some degree, by actual instances of such, and by rites which pointed to them as previously existent, among other Aryan nations, including those of Greece and Rome ; only here, as before, the impressionable and superstitious charac- ter of the Gauls drove them to greater excesses. The doctrine of the transmigration of the soul is a tenet of both Brahmans and Buddhists, of Aryan India, and it found its classical develop- ment in the views of the Greek Pythagoras. The position and fame of the Druids as magicians is, as Pliny points out, of the same nature as those of the Magi of Aryan Persia. Some again think it absurd that if the Druids were such philosophers, as they are represented to have been, they would be so superstitious as to practise human sacrifices, and other wild rites. But there is no incongruity in at once being philosophic and superstitious ; the human mind is very hospitable in its entertainment of quite opposite opinions, especially in moral and religious matters ; for there is a wide difference between theories of the intellect and practices prompted by the emotions. Celtic Religion in Britain and Ireland. In tracing the history of Celtic religion, we have established 48 that the reh'gion of the Gauls fully represents the pagan religion of both the great branches of the Celtic race — the Biythonic (Gauls and Welsh) and the Goidclic (Gaelic races). From Caesar's account of the religion of the Gauls to the first native notices of even the history of Celtic Britain and Ireland, there is practically a period of a thousand years. During the interval, Christianity had established its sway, nominally at least, over the whole land, and paganism was for centuries a thing of the past It may, however, be remarked that one or two Latin eccle- siastical histories appeared in the eighth century — notably the works of Adamnan and Bede, but we in vain scan the pages left us of their works for any definite information as to the previous religion. Gildas, a century before either of these writers, makes only a passing reference to the old faith. " I shall not," says he, "enumerate those diabolical idols of my country, which almost surpassed in number those of Egypt, and of which we still see [circ. A.D. 560] some mouldering away within or without the deserted temples, with stiff and deformed features as was cus- tomary. Nor will I call out upon the mountains, fountains, or hills, or upon the rivers, which now are subservient to the use of men, but once were an abomination and destruction to them, and to which the blind people paid divine honour." Our know- ledge of the local development of Celtic religion in Britain and Ireland cannot be obtained directly from contemporary history: we have, it is true, some British inscriptions of the Roman period, which give, mid a host of minor and local deities, one or two important gods. But our information must be drawn, nearly all, from the heroic poems and tales, which do not date much earlier than a thousand years ago ; and most are far later than this period. For information as to the ritual of the old religion, local customs and superstitions — Bcltaine bannocks and Samhuinn fires — form our only guides. It will also be necessary to discuss separately the remainsof the religion of the early Welsh and the early Gaels. The religion of the former we shall name " British," of the latter, " Gaelic" And it must be remembered that the Welsh are doubtless the remnant of the Gaulish population which, about the time of the Roman conquest, must have occupied England (except Cornwall and Wales) and Lowland Scotland. Gaul and England had, there- 49 fore, practically the same people and language in the first century of this era, and there now remain of them still speaking the language, the Bretons of France and the Welsh of Wales, from which country they drove out or absorbed the previous Gaelic population in the fifth century of our era, or thereabouts. The ** Gaelic Religion " will include the early religion of Ireland and the Highlands of Scotland. British Religion. The gods of Britain suffered what appears to have been the ** common lot " of gods ; they were changed into the kings and champions, the giants and enchanters, of heroic tales and folk- lore. In the words of the poet: — " Ye are gods, and behold, ye shall die, and the waves be upon yoa at last. In the darkness of time, in the deeps of the years, in the changes of things, Ve shall sleep as a slain man sleeps, and the world shall forget you for lungs." The great deity, ** Belinus," appears in the pages of Geoffrey, of Monmouth, as a mere mortal conqueror. In company with his brother, Brennius or " Bran," he marched to the siege of Rome, when " Gabius and Porsena " were consuls ! Gargantua appears twice as a British King, under the title of Gurgiunt Camulus, the war-god, who gave his name to Camulodunum, now CW-chester, is presented as Coel Hen, ** Old King Coul " of the song, who gave his name to the Ayrshire district of Kyle. The god, " Nodens," is the Nudd of Welsh, and King Nuada, of Irish story; and Lir, the sea-god, is immortalised in the pages of Shake- speare as an old British king. Some of the gods fight under Arthur's banner, and perish on the battlefield of Camlan, along with him. There is, consequently, a considerable amount of con- fusion in the Welsh talcs, which does not appear in the more consistent tales of Ireland. Probably, there were kings of the names of Beli, Coel, Urien, and Arthur, and there certainly were kings and chiefs, of the names of Brcnnus, Cassibelaunus, and Caractacus, but their history is irretrievably mixed uu with that of deities and demigods, possessed of similar names. Thus, Bran the Blessed, is a son of Lir, a personage of such gigantic pro- portions that no house could hold him, and evidently a d^raded god, possibly a war-god. He next appears as father of Caradoc, for whom he is sent as hostage to Rome, when the latter is con- G I «1 \'^ 50 quercd by Claudius. In Rome he is converted to Christianity, which he introduced into Britain, and hence his name of ** Bran the Blessed." And again he is brother of Belinus, and the same as the Brennus of the Roman historians, who sacked Rome in &C 390. It is, therefore, a matter of great difficulty to take either history or myth out of the confusion in Welsh poetry and tradi- tion, caused by a little knowledge of classical and Biblical history, a history which is interwoven with native myths and facts. The inscriptions of Roman times show that the religious condition of Britain then differed in no respect from that of Gaul- The local deities were assimilated to the corresponding deities of Rome, and we have in Britain combinations like those met with in Gaul : the Roman deity has the corresponding British name attached to him on the votive inscription by way of epithet Thus, at Bath, altars are dedicated to Sul-Minerva, Sul being a goddess unknown elsewhere. On the Roman wall, between the Forth and Clyde, the name of Mars-Camulus ap- pears on the inscriptions, among many others to the "genii" of the places, the spirits of **the mountain and the flood," and to "Sancta Britannia" and " Brigantia," the goddesses of Britain and the land of the Brigantcs respectively. The most interesting inscriptions were those found in the temple of a god discovered at Lydney Park, in Gloucestershire, One inscription bears to be to the ** great god Nodon," which proves the temple to have been dedi- cated to the worship of Nodon, a god of the deep sea, figured on a bronze plaque as a Triton or Neptune borne by sea-horses and surrounded by a laughing crowd of Nereids. This deity is identi- fied with the legendary Nudd, known in Welsh fiction only as the father of famous sons and in Irish story as King Nuada of the Silver Hand, who fought the two battles of Moytura, and fell in the second before " Balor of the Evil Eye," the King of the Fomorians. Passing, however, to the Welsh legends and myths preserv^ed in the " Ancient Books of Wales" and in the prose " Mabinogion," we can easily eliminate three principal families of deities, the children of " Don," of " Nudd," and of " Lir." Of these the first are purely Welsh, the second — the chi Idren of Nudd — have Irish equivalents both in name and office, while the children of Lir belong equally to both nations. The family of Don is evidently 51 connected with the sky and its changes. He has given his name in Welsh to the constellation of Cassiopeia, called Llys Don, the court of Don. The milky way is named after his son, Gwydion, Caer Gwydion, the city of Gwydion ; and his daughter Arianrhod, "silver-circled," inhabits the bright circle of stars which is called the Northern Crown. With the name Don may be compared that of the father of the Irish hero Diarmat, son of Donn. Gwydion is the greatest of enchanters — a prince of the powers of air. He can change the forms of trees, men, and animals, and along with " Math, the son of Mathonwy," his master, styled by Professor Rhys, the Cambrian Pluto, though rather a god of air than earth, he forms a woman out of flowers. "They took the blossoms of the oak, and the blossoms of the broom, and the blossoms of the meadow-sweet, and produced from them a maiden, the fairest and most graceful that man ever saw.** Amacthon, the son of Don, is a husbandman — doubtless a god of weather and crops. He has a fight with Arawn, king of Annwn, or Hell, for a white roebuck and a whelp, which he had carried off from the realms of darkness. The battle is known as the " battle of the trees," and in it Gwydion, by his divinations, won the victory for his brother, for he guessed the name of the person in the ranks of his opponents, which had to be guessed before either side won. Nudd, like Don, is eclipsed by his family. He appears to have been god of the deep and its treasures. His son Gwynn, known always as Gwynn ap Nudd, is the Welsh king of the Fairies in the widest sense of the word. It would appear that Gwynn is no less a person than the god of the next world for human beings. He answers, therefore, to the king of " Tir-nan- og," ** Land of Youth" of the Irish legends, and " Tir-fo-Thuinn* of the Gaelic stories — the land below the waves. The son of the deep-sea god is naturally enough made lord over the happy realm under the waves of the West Christian bias, however, gave Gwynn a more sinister position. We arc told that God placed him over the brood of devils in Annwn, lest they should destroy the present race. A Saint of the name of Collen one day heard two men conversing about Gwynn ap Nudd, and saying that he was King of Annwn and the Fairies. *' Hold your tongue quickly," says Collen, " these are but devils." " Hold thou thy I 52 tongue," said they, " thou shalt receive a reproof from him." And sure enough the Saint was summoned to the palace of Gwynn on a neighbouring hill top, where, he was kindly received, and bid sit down to a sumptuous repast ** I will not eat the leaves of the trees," said Collcn ; for he saw through the enchant- ments of Gwynn, and, by the use of some holy water, caused Gwynn and his castle to disappear in the twinkling of an eye The story is interesting, as showing how the early missionaries dealt with the native gods. Gwynn, according to St Collen, is merely a demon. His connection with the lower world is brought out by his fight with Gwythyr, the son of Greidwal, for Cordelia, the daughter of Lir or Lud. She is represented as a splendid maiden, daughter of the sea-god Lir, "a blossom of flowering seas," at once a Venus and a Proserpine, goddess of the summer flowers, for whom there is a fight between the powers of the worlds above and below the earth respectively. Peace was made between these two deities on these conditions : " that the maiden should remain in her father's house, without advantage to either of them, and that Gwynn ap Nudd, and Gwythyr, the son of Greidwal, should fight for her every first of May, from thence- forth till the day of doom, and that whichever of them should be conqueror then, should have the maiden." We have thus discovered in Don and his children the powers of sky and air, answering to Jove and his Olympians of Classical Mythology; in Nudd and his son Gwynn we have probably found the powers that rule over the land of " shades," correspond- ing to Pluto or Dis ; and we now come to consider the third family of British deities, Lir and his children, whom we shall find to be the British and Gaelic equivalents of Neptune, the sea- god, and Aphrodite, "daughter of the foam." Lir, or as the Welsh spell the name, Llyr, is the same as the Gaelic /ear^ found in the Ossianic poems, and signifying the " sea." Lir is there- fore the personification of the sea — the sea deified. He is a deity common to both Britons and Gaels ; indeed, it may rather be said that he is more properly a deity of the Gaels transferred into the British pantheon. The epithet Llediaith^ or "half- speech," that is, " dialect," which is attached to his name, goes to show that he was not a deity of native British origin. We arc therefore justified in considering Lir as the sea deity of the 53 ancient remnant of the Gaels still surviving and maintaining their ground in Wales in the fifth century, and represented as then expelled by Cunedda and his sons. They were, however, more probably slowly absorbed by the Welsh, who were then pressed westwards by the Saxons. All the legends preserved in Welsh, connected with Lir and his family, point to a strong Gaelic influence, if not to a Gaelic origin. Of Lir himself no- thing is said in the Welsh legends beyond his being the father of so many children ; in Ireland he is represented as striving for the sovereignty of the Tuatha-De-Dannan, the Gaelic gods, with Bove Derg, son of the Dagda, and, when defeated in hi» aspira- tions, as retiring to Sidh-Fionnachaidh. Here he leads the life of a provincial chief, and all else that we know of him is the cruel transformation of his four children by their wicked aunt and stepmother. Lir has also another name ; at least he must have had another name, or else Mannanan, his son, and Cordelia, his daughter, must each have had two fathers. In some tradi- tions they are both represented as the children of Llud. The same confusion, of course, appears in the Irish genealogy of Man- nanan ; for the most part he is known as the son of Lir, but in the genealogies he is set down as the son of Alloid, doubtless the original, or, at least, the equivalent of Llud. Professor Rhys thinks that Llud stands for Nudd, the N changing into LI, be- cause Llud also received the title of Llaw Ereint, ** silver- handed," just as the Irish King Nuada did ; and the principle of alliteration required the changing of Nudd Llaw Ereint into Llud Llaw Ereint. And Nudd, besides, was somehow a god of the sea; what was the necessity of two chief sea-gods? We have interpreted Nudd as a god of the ** land under the waves,** and not as the sea-god proper ; and, again, the Irish Alloid is distinctly against any such change of letters as Nudd into. Llud, besides its being otherwise far from probable that such a change should occur on any principle of alliteration. Lir, under the name of Llud, is, in the histories and talcs, the brother of Cassi- bclaunus, Caesar's opponent, and in his reign Britain was troubled with three direful plagues : the Coranians, a people " whose knowledge was such that there was no discourse upon the face of the Island, however it might be spoken, but what, if the wind blew it, it was known to them ; " second, a shriek that 64 occurred every May eve, that created all kinds of terrors and horrors ; and, third, the king's winter provisions disappeared every year when stored. From these plagues the wis dom of his brother Llevelys freed King Llud. Lir appears in the pages of Geoffrey of Monmouth as an old British king, who reigned long before Llud, and who had three daughters, whose story forms the groundwork of Shakespeare's tragedy of King Lear. Mannanan, the son of Lir, is in the Welsh Myths one of the seven — that mystical number, so common in the old Welsh poems — who escaped from Ireland on the death of his brother. Bran, the blessed, king of Britain. Returning with the head of Bran, the seven heroes found the throne usurped by Cassibel- aunus and retired to Harlech, where the birds of Rhiannon kept them enchanted by their music for seven years ; and after this they feasted for eighty years more at G wales in Pcnvro, from which place they set out to London and buried Bran's head with its face to France. As long as Bran's head was left there facing France no invasion of Britain could be successful. Un- fortunately Arthur exhumed the head, declaring that he would maintain the country against any foe without need of super- natural safeguard. In his subsequent career Mannanan is seen to be a deity who presides over arts and commerce, a god who is " deep in counsel." He and another of the mythic seven wander about doing artificers' work ; he successively tries saddle- making, shoemaking, and shieldmaking, trades in which he out-distances all competitors as a matter of course. From the Irish accounts of him, Mannanan Mac Lir, appears to be a god of sea and wind. Cormac, Archbishop of Cashel, of the ninth century, describes him in his glossary like a true Euhemerist, as *' Manannan mac lir, a renowned trader who dwelt in the Is- land of Man. He was the best pilot in the west of Europe. Through acquaintance with the sky he knew the quarter in which would be fair weather and foul weather, and when each of these two seasons would change. Hence the Scots and Britons called him a god of the sea, and hence they said he was son of the sea, that is, mac lir^ * son of the sea.' " Mannanan is other- wise represented as one of the Tuatha-De-Dannan chiefs. He was the possessor of that wonderful steed mentioned in the story of the ** Children of Tuireann." Luga of the Long Arms •* rode / 55 the steed of Mannanan Mac Lir, namely Enbarr of the Flowing Mane : no warrior was ever killed on the back of this steed, for she was as swift as the cold clear wind of spring, and she travelled with equal ease on land and on sea. He wore Man- nanan*s coat of mail ; no one could be wounded through it, or above it or below it He had on his breast Mannanan's breast- plate, which no weapon could pierce. Mannanan*s sword. The Answerer, hung at his left side ; no one ever recovered from its wound ; and those who were opposed to it in the battle-field were so terrified by looking at it that their strength left them and they became weaker than women." In the curious story called the ** Sick-bed of Cuchulainn,'* Mannanan is represented as a fairy chief who deserts his fairy bride Fand, but Fand is helped and loved by Cuchulainn, mortal though he was. Man- nanan on discovering this, r^^tums to his wife and shakes his magic cloak between her and Cuchulainn, so that they should never meet again. This magic cloak had also the eficct of producing forgetfulness of the past Of Mannanan, Mr Elton says: *• In him we see personified the splendour and swiftness of the sun ; the god rushes over the waves like a 'wheel of fire 'and his three-legged shape recalls the giant strides of Vishnu. He was the patron of traffic and merchandise. The best weapons and jewels from across the sea were thought to be gifts from the god." Branwen, " white-bosom," the daughter of Lir, is the central figure of the most tragic of Welsh myths. She is married to Matholwch, King of Ireland, who treats her badly. Her brother Hran, coming to know of it, invades Ireland. The Irish yield. and build a house big enough for Bran to enter into, a thing he never hitherto could get, so enormous was his size. But the Irish had decided to murder their guests at the first feast in the great house. The cleverness of one of Bran's men foils their purpose ; there is, however, a general slaughter, in which the Irish have at first the best of it, for they possess a cauldron, into which, when any one is dipped that is dead, he comes to life hale and sound. But the cauldron is discovered by the already-mentioned one of Bran's men, and he breaks it Bran is killed, and only seven re- turn of his people to Wales. The story as a whole is a very widely-spread one ; it appears in about a dozen forms in Teutonic lands— the Volsung Saga and the Nibelung story being the most 56 famous forms of it Probably there arc in the myth the evidences of a time when Celt and Teuton lived not too amicably together on the banks of the Rhine, a supposition which would obviate the necessity of supposing the Celtic version a borrowed one, inferior though it may be in some details. Another legend represents Branwcn or Brangwaine as helping the loves, illicit though they be, of Tristram and Iseult It is she that hands to Tristram the fateful love-potion which binds him irrevocably to Iseult Hence Mr Elton considers her the Venus of the Northern Sea& Indeed, the sea was |xx:tically named **thc fountain of Venus," according to the lolo MSS.; and a verse in the " Black Book of Carmarthen " gives this stanza : — *' Accursed be the damsel Who, after the wailing. Let loose the Fountain of Venus, the raging deep." From this we can easily understand how Branwen may be Venus and daughter of the sea-god as well, just as Aphrodite was sprung from the foam of the sea. Cordelia, another daughter of Lear or Llud, has already been mentioned as the resplendent summer goddess for whom the powers of air and the shades fight every May